rs138081804

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001605.3(AARS1):c.2185C>T(p.Arg729Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,613,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00070 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

AARS1
NM_001605.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.83

Variant links:

Genes affected

AARS1 (HGNC:20): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 1) The human alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) belongs to a family of tRNA synthases, of the class II enzymes. Class II tRNA synthases evolved early in evolution and are highly conserved. This is reflected by the fact that 498 of the 968-residue polypeptide human AARS shares 41% identity witht the E.coli protein. tRNA synthases are the enzymes that interpret the RNA code and attach specific aminoacids to the tRNAs that contain the cognate trinucleotide anticodons. They consist of a catalytic domain which interacts with the amino acid acceptor-T psi C helix of the tRNA, and a second domain which interacts with the rest of the tRNA structure. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

AARS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.34738052).

BP6

Variant 16-70255829-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 155734.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=5}. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000702 (107/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00129 (88/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00107. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
AARS1	NM_001605.3 link	c.2185C>T	p.Arg729Trp	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 21	ENST00000261772.13	NP_001596.2	P49588-1
AARS1	XM_047433666.1 link	c.2000C>T	p.Ala667Val	missense_variant	Exon 15 of 16		XP_047289622.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
AARS1	ENST00000261772.13 link	c.2185C>T	p.Arg729Trp	missense_variant	Exon 16 of 21	1	NM_001605.3	ENSP00000261772.8		P49588-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000710

AC:

108

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000314

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000262

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00131

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000957

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000647

AC:

161

AN:

249026

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000601

AC XY:

AN XY:

134678

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000311

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000657

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00130

AC:

1905

AN:

1460850

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00120

AC XY:

871

AN XY:

726666

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000426

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000233

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000750

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00165

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000679

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000702

AC:

107

AN:

152314

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000645

AC XY:

AN XY:

74472

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00129

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000947

Alfa

AF:

0.00110

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000684

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00189

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00208

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000698

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000428

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3Benign:5

Oct 11, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 28, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 03, 2024

GeneDx

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Reported in individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; however it was also identified in 2/1090 normal control chromosomes (PMID: 22009580); Reported as a variant of uncertain significance in an individual with CMT2; the patient was also found to have a variant in another gene and it was unclear if either variant was causative for the patient's phenotype (PMID: 26752306); Reported in an individual with axonal neuropathy; the R729W variant does not segregate with disease in the family as it was observed in both affected and unaffected family members and was absent in affected family members, and the patient was also found to have a variant in another gene that appears to segregate with disease in the family (PMID: 30642740); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32376792, 25817015, Elshiekh2020[article], 22009580, 26752306, 30642740) -

Nov 01, 2018

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Northcott Neuroscience Laboratory, ANZAC Research Institute

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: literature only

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Uncertain:1

Molecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Oct 31, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Unlikely to be causative of AARS-related Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 2 (AD) Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2N

Benign:1

Apr 28, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.17

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.28

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.17

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Pathogenic

0.84

Eigen

Uncertain

0.57

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.52

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.98

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.99

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.18

MetaRNN

Benign

0.35

MetaSVM

Uncertain

-0.24

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.30

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.5

REVEL

Uncertain

0.32

Sift

Uncertain

0.0080

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.017

Polyphen

0.96

Vest4

0.48

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.52

ClinPred

0.11

GERP RS

5.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.92

RBP_regulation_power_radar

2.1

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.50

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over