Menu
GeneBe

rs138081804

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BP6BS1BS2

The NM_001605.3(AARS1):​c.2185C>T​(p.Arg729Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,613,164 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R729Q) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00070 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

AARS1
NM_001605.3 missense

Scores

3
10
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.83
Variant links:
Genes affected
AARS1 (HGNC:20): (alanyl-tRNA synthetase 1) The human alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AARS) belongs to a family of tRNA synthases, of the class II enzymes. Class II tRNA synthases evolved early in evolution and are highly conserved. This is reflected by the fact that 498 of the 968-residue polypeptide human AARS shares 41% identity witht the E.coli protein. tRNA synthases are the enzymes that interpret the RNA code and attach specific aminoacids to the tRNAs that contain the cognate trinucleotide anticodons. They consist of a catalytic domain which interacts with the amino acid acceptor-T psi C helix of the tRNA, and a second domain which interacts with the rest of the tRNA structure. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.34738052).
BP6
Variant 16-70255829-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 155734.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=5, Benign=1, Likely_benign=2}. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr16-70255829-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000702 (107/152314) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00129 (88/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00107. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
AARS1NM_001605.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2185C>T p.Arg729Trp missense_variant 16/21 ENST00000261772.13
AARS1XM_047433666.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.2000C>T p.Ala667Val missense_variant 15/16

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
AARS1ENST00000261772.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.2185C>T p.Arg729Trp missense_variant 16/211 NM_001605.3 P1P49588-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000710
AC:
108
AN:
152196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000314
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000957
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000647
AC:
161
AN:
249026
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000601
AC XY:
81
AN XY:
134678
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000311
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000524
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000657
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00130
AC:
1905
AN:
1460850
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00120
AC XY:
871
AN XY:
726666
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000269
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000426
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000233
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000750
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00165
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000679
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000702
AC:
107
AN:
152314
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000645
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000947
Alfa
AF:
0.00110
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000684
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00189
AC:
7
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00208
AC:
8
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000698
AC:
6
ExAC
AF:
0.000428
AC:
52

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:3Benign:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2018- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsMar 28, 2017- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 17, 2023Reported in individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease; however it was also identified in 2/1090 normal control chromosomes (PMID: 22009580); Reported as a variant of uncertain significance in an individual with CMT2; the patient was also found to have a variant in another gene and it was unclear if either variant was causative for the patient's phenotype (PMID: 26752306); Reported in an individual with axonal neuropathy; the R729W variant does not segregate with disease in the family as it was observed in both affected and unaffected family members and was absent in affected family members, and the patient was also found to have a variant in another gene that appears to segregate with disease in the family (PMID: 30642740); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32376792, 25817015, Elshiekh2020[article], 22009580, 26752306, 30642740) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDiagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesApr 10, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyNorthcott Neuroscience Laboratory, ANZAC Research Institute-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsOct 31, 2023Unlikely to be causative of AARS-related Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type 2 (AD) Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease axonal type 2N Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 28, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.28
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.17
CADD
Pathogenic
31
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.84
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.57
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.52
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.18
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.35
T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.24
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.5
D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.32
Sift
Uncertain
0.0080
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.017
D
Polyphen
0.96
D
Vest4
0.48
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.52
ClinPred
0.11
T
GERP RS
5.0
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.1
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.50

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138081804; hg19: chr16-70289732; API