rs138251566

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_007078.3(LDB3):​c.1051A>G​(p.Thr351Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000481 in 1,612,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00029 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

LDB3
NM_007078.3 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.38
Variant links:
Genes affected
LDB3 (HGNC:15710): (LIM domain binding 3) This gene encodes a PDZ domain-containing protein. PDZ motifs are modular protein-protein interaction domains consisting of 80-120 amino acid residues. PDZ domain-containing proteins interact with each other in cytoskeletal assembly or with other proteins involved in targeting and clustering of membrane proteins. The protein encoded by this gene interacts with alpha-actinin-2 through its N-terminal PDZ domain and with protein kinase C via its C-terminal LIM domains. The LIM domain is a cysteine-rich motif defined by 50-60 amino acids containing two zinc-binding modules. This protein also interacts with all three members of the myozenin family. Mutations in this gene have been associated with myofibrillar myopathy and dilated cardiomyopathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been identified; all isoforms have N-terminal PDZ domains while only longer isoforms (1, 2 and 5) have C-terminal LIM domains. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01079753).
BP6
Variant 10-86706685-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-86706685-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 36942.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr10-86706685-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 44 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
LDB3NM_007078.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1051A>G p.Thr351Ala missense_variant 8/14 ENST00000361373.9 NP_009009.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LDB3ENST00000361373.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1051A>G p.Thr351Ala missense_variant 8/141 NM_007078.3 ENSP00000355296 P4O75112-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000296
AC:
45
AN:
152086
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000544
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000453
AC:
112
AN:
247106
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000484
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
134344
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000929
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000982
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000614
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00149
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000501
AC:
732
AN:
1460460
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000512
AC XY:
372
AN XY:
726558
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000806
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000267
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000568
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000580
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000289
AC:
44
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
74420
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000482
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000530
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000501
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000374
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000478
AC:
58
EpiCase
AF:
0.000981
EpiControl
AF:
0.000772

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpNov 20, 2023Variant summary: LDB3 c.1051A>G (p.Thr351Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00045 in 247106 control chromosomes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 14.5 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LDB3 causing Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Left Ventricular Noncompaction phenotype (3.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1051A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy and ARVC, without strong evidence for causality (Kadiyska_2007, Lopez-Ayala_2014). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Eight submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. Multiple submitters reported the variant with conflicting assessments: three submitters classified as VUS while five classified as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingStanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford UniversityJul 05, 2013Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. LDB3 p.Thr351Ala Arbustini et al (2007) submitted a brief report to Human Genetics on this variant as a novel variant seen in a 62-year-old male with “noncompaction dilated cardiomyopathy.” I also found a conference abstract in Italian that appears to report the variant in a patient with LVNC (Tripodi et al 2010 71st Congresso Nazionale della Societa Italiana di Cardiologia). A translation via Google translate indicates the authors report the p.Thr351Ala variant in a 41-year old male with LVNC. No segregation or function data was provided in either report. Vatta et al (2003) reported a variant (p.Ile352Met) at the neighboring codon that was present in all five family members with DCM and absent in 200 controls. They predicted that this variant would “abolish an alpha-helix a short beta-sheet.” Another nearby variant (p.Thr350Ile) has been reported in a case of a child with Barth Syndrome (Marziliano et al 2007). That patient also had a nonsense variant in TAZ. Interestingly, the patient’s brother and father both carried the p.Thr350Ile LDB3 variant and had non-compaction on echo, though not severe enough to make diagnostic criteria for LVNC. Arbustini et al (2007) also reported that another patient with “noncompaction dilated cardiomyopathy” had a variant in another nearby codon (p.Thr358Ala). The p.Thr351Ala variant in LDB3 is a non conservative amino acid change with a polar, neutral Threonine replaced with a non polar neutral Alanine. In silico analysis (PolyPhen and SIFT) predicts the variant to be benign and tolerated respectively. While the cases reviewed above do not include HCM, variants in LDB3 have been implicated in HCM. Tripodi et al (2010) did not observe the variant in either 150 or 300 control individuals (difficult to tell in the translated text). No other control data is available, however the variant is not reported in dbSNP (checked March 2nd, 2011) Based on these data, this variant may cause cardiomyopathy, though there is insufficient data available to support predictive genetic testing in at-risk family members. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJun 28, 2017p.Thr351Ala in exon 10 of LDB3: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including multiple mamm als. In addition, this variant has been identified in 0.08% (27/34356) of Latino and 0.06% (78/124442) of European chromosomes Genome Aggregation Database (gnom AD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs138251566), and in individuals wi th different, non-overlapping cardiomyopathies, including two individuals with a disease-causing variant sufficient to cause their disease (LMM data). -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 04, 2021Reported in association with non-compaction dilated cardiomyopathy (Arbustini et al., 2007); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Reported in ClinVar (ClinVar Variant ID# 36942; Landrum et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31078652, 17438604, 33633783, 23299917, 27896284, 20474083, 25616123, 25041374, 29517769) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2024LDB3: BP4 -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1A Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart InstituteFeb 26, 2020- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioAug 11, 2021- -
Myofibrillar myopathy 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
LDB3-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 24, 2023This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterresearchAgnes Ginges Centre for Molecular Cardiology, Centenary InstituteMar 16, 2017The LDB3 Thr351Ala has been reported before in an an ARVD/C proband, and was found to cosegregate to two siblings diagnosed with ARVD/C (Lopez JM, et al., 2014). This variant has also been found in a 62yo male patient with severe dilated cardiomyopathy with non-compaction (Arbustini E, et al., 2007) and a HCM patient with another likely causal variant (LMM ClinVar; SCV000062395.4). It is present in the 1000 genomes project (http://www.1000genomes.org/), and the Exome Aggregation Consortium dataset (http://exac.broadinstitute.org/), at an allele frequency >0.0004, which is higher then expected for an inherited heart disease. We identified this variant in a HCM proband with no family history of HCM or SCD. Computational tools SIFT, PolyPhen-2 and MutationTaster predict this variant to be non-deleterious. In summary, based on a high allele frequency in the general population and in silico tools predicting no functional affect on the protein, we classify LDB3 Thr351Ala as "likely benign". -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMar 23, 2020This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.053
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.22
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.18
CADD
Benign
0.029
DANN
Benign
0.34
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.17
T
Eigen
Benign
-2.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-2.1
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.0071
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.26
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.012
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.83
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.055
N
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.42
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.040
N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.46
Sift
Benign
0.45
T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.059
MVP
0.53
ClinPred
0.013
T
GERP RS
-9.3
Varity_R
0.023

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138251566; hg19: chr10-88466442; API