rs138497710
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001042413.2(GLIS3):c.1191G>C(p.Gln397His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00292 in 1,583,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0030 ( 9 hom. )
Consequence
GLIS3
NM_001042413.2 missense
NM_001042413.2 missense
Scores
5
14
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.33
Genes affected
GLIS3 (HGNC:28510): (GLIS family zinc finger 3) This gene is a member of the GLI-similar zinc finger protein family and encodes a nuclear protein with five C2H2-type zinc finger domains. This protein functions as both a repressor and activator of transcription and is specifically involved in the development of pancreatic beta cells, the thyroid, eye, liver and kidney. Mutations in this gene have been associated with neonatal diabetes and congenital hypothyroidism (NDH). Alternatively spliced variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described but the full-length nature of only two have been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009463966).
BP6
?
Variant 9-4118287-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-4118287-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 393416.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr9-4118287-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00173 (264/152324) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0026 (177/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00229. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 133 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIS3 | NM_001042413.2 | c.1191G>C | p.Gln397His | missense_variant | 4/11 | ENST00000381971.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLIS3 | ENST00000381971.8 | c.1191G>C | p.Gln397His | missense_variant | 4/11 | 5 | NM_001042413.2 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00173 AC: 264AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
264
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00222 AC: 411AN: 185294Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00214 AC XY: 219AN XY: 102236
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
411
AN:
185294
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
219
AN XY:
102236
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00304 AC: 4352AN: 1431066Hom.: 9 Cov.: 36 AF XY: 0.00296 AC XY: 2103AN XY: 709550
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
4352
AN:
1431066
Hom.:
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
AC XY:
2103
AN XY:
709550
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00173 AC: 264AN: 152324Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00179 AC XY: 133AN XY: 74482
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
264
AN:
152324
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
74482
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
18
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
9
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
7
ExAC
?
AF:
AC:
221
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 18, 2024 | - - |
Monogenic diabetes Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine | Jul 07, 2016 | ACMG Criteria: PP3, BP4 - |
GLIS3-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 17, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Neonatal diabetes mellitus with congenital hypothyroidism Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Uncertain
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
P;P
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of solvent accessibility (P = 0.1922);.;
MVP
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at