rs138904906

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.764A>G​(p.Asn255Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000228 in 1,582,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N255T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000092 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 missense

Scores

2
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:10B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.904

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]
BARD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • hereditary breast carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.07121819).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000154 (22/1429728) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000628 (20/31828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000416. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 7 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 14 AD gene.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000465.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BARD1
NM_000465.4
MANE Select
c.764A>Gp.Asn255Ser
missense
Exon 4 of 11NP_000456.2
BARD1
NM_001282543.2
c.707A>Gp.Asn236Ser
missense
Exon 3 of 10NP_001269472.1
BARD1
NR_104212.2
n.729A>G
non_coding_transcript_exon
Exon 3 of 10

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
BARD1
ENST00000260947.9
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.764A>Gp.Asn255Ser
missense
Exon 4 of 11ENSP00000260947.4
BARD1
ENST00000617164.5
TSL:1
c.707A>Gp.Asn236Ser
missense
Exon 3 of 10ENSP00000480470.1
BARD1
ENST00000613706.5
TSL:1
c.764A>Gp.Asn255Ser
missense
Exon 4 of 11ENSP00000484976.2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000854
AC:
13
AN:
152180
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000197
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000271
AC:
6
AN:
221662
AF XY:
0.0000168
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000154
AC:
22
AN:
1429728
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00000988
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
708562
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000628
AC:
20
AN:
31828
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000257
AC:
1
AN:
38906
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
24168
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39444
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
79756
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52370
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5572
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1098808
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000170
AC:
1
AN:
58876
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.491
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000919
AC:
14
AN:
152298
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000940
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74480
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
11
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000196
AC:
3
AN:
15286
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10628
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68004
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.529
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0000389
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000113
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:10Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:5
Feb 24, 2023
Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk.

Jan 26, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces asparagine, which is neutral and polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 255 of the BARD1 protein (p.Asn255Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs138904906, gnomAD 0.03%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with breast cancer (PMID: 32039725, 32866190, 32885271). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 245891). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function outputs the following: PolyPhen-2: "Benign". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

Oct 22, 2023
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 17, 2018
Counsyl
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This submission and the accompanying classification are no longer maintained by the submitter. For more information on current observations and classification, please contact variantquestions@myriad.com.

Mar 28, 2024
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Uncertain:2
Nov 11, 2024
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31871109, 23056176, 32039725, 32885271, 32832836, 32866190)

Sep 28, 2023
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1Benign:1
Apr 12, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Jul 15, 2024
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This missense variant replaces asparagine with serine at codon 255 of the BARD1 protein. Computational prediction suggests that this variant may not impact protein structure and function. To our knowledge, functional studies have not been reported for this variant. This variant has been identified in individuals affected with breast cancer (PMID: 31871109, 32039725, 32866190, 32885271). This variant has been identified in 8/253060 chromosomes in the general population by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). The available evidence is insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease conclusively. Therefore, this variant is classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.

not specified Uncertain:1
Jul 13, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: BARD1 c.764A>G (p.Asn255Ser) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 2.7e-05 in 221662 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00038 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.764A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with breast cancer without strong evidence of causality (Adedokun_2020, Bishop_2020, Carvalho_2020). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publications have been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 23056176, 32039725, 31871109, 32866190). Seven submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as uncertain significance (n=6) or likely benign (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance.

Malignant tumor of breast Uncertain:1
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

The BARD1 p.Asn255Ser variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs138904906) as “with uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (interpreted as "uncertain significance" by Invitae and 5 others). The variant was identified in control databases in 8 of 247,792 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 8 of 23,516 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), but not in the “Other”, Latino, European, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, Finnish and South Asian populations. The p.Asn255 residue is conserved in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however four out of five computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance.

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:1
Apr 19, 2022
National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.069
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.44
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.14
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.19
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.30
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.78
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.021
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.071
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.73
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M
PhyloP100
0.90
PrimateAI
Benign
0.30
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N
REVEL
Benign
0.24
Sift
Benign
0.26
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.15
T
Polyphen
0.96
D
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.90
MPC
0.071
ClinPred
0.080
T
GERP RS
3.4
Varity_R
0.093
gMVP
0.11
Mutation Taster
=92/8
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs138904906; hg19: chr2-215645834; API