rs139612775
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.1554C>T(p.Ala518=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000279 in 1,613,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A518A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | NM_000465.4 | c.1554C>T | p.Ala518= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | ENST00000260947.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BARD1 | ENST00000260947.9 | c.1554C>T | p.Ala518= | synonymous_variant | 6/11 | 1 | NM_000465.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251220Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000221 AC XY: 3AN XY: 135768
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000157 AC: 23AN: 1461352Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.0000124 AC XY: 9AN XY: 727002
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000145 AC: 22AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Aug 11, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Oct 15, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 16, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Oct 28, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 31, 2018 | Variant summary: The variant, BARD1 c.1554C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 276952 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00029 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1554C>T in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
BARD1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 17, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BARD1 p.Ala518= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139612775) as “With Uncertain significance allele” and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae and Color; and as uncertain significance by Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America). The variant was identified in control databases in 11 of 276952 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 7 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 3 of 34388 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), and European Non-Finnish in 1 of 126510 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ala518= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 21, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at