rs139612775

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):​c.1554C>T​(p.Ala518=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000279 in 1,613,600 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A518A) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.84
Variant links:
Genes affected
BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 2-214767496-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214767496-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 186247.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.84 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 22 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BARD1NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1554C>T p.Ala518= synonymous_variant 6/11 ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BARD1ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1554C>T p.Ala518= synonymous_variant 6/111 NM_000465.4 P2Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152130
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000279
AC:
7
AN:
251220
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135768
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000880
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000157
AC:
23
AN:
1461352
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000124
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
727002
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000388
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000895
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000270
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000145
AC:
22
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74430
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000433
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000658
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000144

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthAug 11, 2015- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Oct 15, 2020- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsSep 16, 2014This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoOct 28, 2022- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpDec 31, 2018Variant summary: The variant, BARD1 c.1554C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4e-05 in 276952 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00029 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.1554C>T in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Two clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
BARD1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 17, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System-The BARD1 p.Ala518= variant was not identified in the literature. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs139612775) as “With Uncertain significance allele” and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae and Color; and as uncertain significance by Integrated Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America). The variant was identified in control databases in 11 of 276952 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00004 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 7 of 24030 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), Latino in 3 of 34388 chromosomes (freq: 0.00009), and European Non-Finnish in 1 of 126510 chromosomes (freq: 0.000008), while it was not observed in the Other, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, European Finnish, or South Asian populations. The p.Ala518= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -
Familial cancer of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 21, 2024- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
8.2
DANN
Benign
0.69

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139612775; hg19: chr2-215632220; API