rs139620052

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2

The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.2082C>T(p.Leu694=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000756 in 1,614,052 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00016 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000066 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BARD1
NM_000465.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.445

Variant links:

Genes affected

BARD1 (HGNC:952): (BRCA1 associated RING domain 1) This gene encodes a protein which interacts with the N-terminal region of BRCA1. In addition to its ability to bind BRCA1 in vivo and in vitro, it shares homology with the 2 most conserved regions of BRCA1: the N-terminal RING motif and the C-terminal BRCT domain. The RING motif is a cysteine-rich sequence found in a variety of proteins that regulate cell growth, including the products of tumor suppressor genes and dominant protooncogenes. This protein also contains 3 tandem ankyrin repeats. The BARD1/BRCA1 interaction is disrupted by tumorigenic amino acid substitutions in BRCA1, implying that the formation of a stable complex between these proteins may be an essential aspect of BRCA1 tumor suppression. This protein may be the target of oncogenic mutations in breast or ovarian cancer. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2013]

BARD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.69).

BP6

Variant 2-214728928-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-214728928-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 186324.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.445 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd at 25 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
BARD1	NM_000465.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2082C>T	p.Leu694=	synonymous_variant	11/11	ENST00000260947.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
BARD1	ENST00000260947.9 linkuse as main transcript	c.2082C>T	p.Leu694=	synonymous_variant	11/11	1	NM_000465.4	P2	Q99728-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000164

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000167

AC:

AN:

251268

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000155

AC XY:

AN XY:

135798

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000880

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000664

AC:

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000646

AC XY:

AN XY:

727238

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000299

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000671

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00157

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000629

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000164

AC:

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000215

AC XY:

AN XY:

74346

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00179

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Bravo

AF:

0.0000264

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health	Aug 14, 2017	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Ambry Genetics	Sep 26, 2014	This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	curation	Sema4, Sema4	Nov 18, 2021	- -

Familial cancer of breast

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Invitae	Jan 03, 2024	- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Apr 27, 2017	This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. -

not specified

Benign:1

Benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

GeneDx

Apr 10, 2015

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

BARD1-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 08, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.69

Cadd

Benign

2.2

Dann

Benign

0.95

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.080

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over