Menu
GeneBe

rs139889944

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):c.4805G>A(p.Arg1602Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00111 in 1,611,594 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 39 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1602W) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 5 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 34 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

5
8
5

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.34
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007830411).
BP6
Variant 11-77199771-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77199771-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 43260.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr11-77199771-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-77199771-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0017 (259/152300) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0446 (231/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0399. There are 5 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 138 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.4805G>A p.Arg1602Gln missense_variant 35/49 ENST00000409709.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.4805G>A p.Arg1602Gln missense_variant 35/491 NM_000260.4 Q13402-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00170
AC:
258
AN:
152182
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0445
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00430
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00371
AC:
917
AN:
247340
Hom.:
27
AF XY:
0.00349
AC XY:
469
AN XY:
134204
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000650
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000116
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0487
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000692
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00200
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00105
AC:
1528
AN:
1459294
Hom.:
34
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00104
AC XY:
751
AN XY:
725530
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000179
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0316
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000721
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00242
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00170
AC:
259
AN:
152300
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00185
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0446
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000588
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00473
Alfa
AF:
0.00140
Hom.:
3
Bravo
AF:
0.00163
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000255
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000121
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00324
AC:
391
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0140
AC:
50
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenMay 01, 2023MYO7A: BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 14, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedliterature onlyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Kyoto University-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 07, 2012p.Arg1602Gln in exon 35 of MYO7A: This variant is not expect to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 4.4% (377/8484) of East Asian chrom osomes including 7 homozygotes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http:/ /exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs139889944). This variant was reported in 2 ind ividuals with Usher syndrome (Liu 1998, Weston 1998). It was reported in trans with p.Leu651Pro in MYO7A of uncertain significance in two affected siblings (Li u 1998) and to be homozygous in another individual (Weston 1998), which is consi stent with its allele frequency in the general population and insufficient to su pport pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 08, 2016- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Usher syndrome type 1 Benign:1Other:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
not provided, no classification providedliterature onlyGeneReviews-- -
Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaMar 06, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Usher syndrome type 1B Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 17, 2020- -
Usher syndrome type 1;C1832475:Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11;C1838701:Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsNov 09, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.44
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.20
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.020
Cadd
Pathogenic
28
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.69
D;.;.;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.72
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.72
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.99
D;D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0078
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.33
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.48
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D;T;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;D
Polyphen
0.98
D;.;.;.
Vest4
0.73
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.50
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
5.0
Varity_R
0.50
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs139889944; hg19: chr11-76910816; API