rs140469160

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001128178.3(NPHP1):​c.953C>T​(p.Thr318Ile) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000146 in 1,592,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/23 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00079 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NPHP1
NM_001128178.3 missense, splice_region

Scores

6
13
Splicing: ADA: 0.003788
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.97
Variant links:
Genes affected
NPHP1 (HGNC:7905): (nephrocystin 1) This gene encodes a protein with src homology domain 3 (SH3) patterns. This protein interacts with Crk-associated substrate, and it appears to function in the control of cell division, as well as in cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesion signaling, likely as part of a multifunctional complex localized in actin- and microtubule-based structures. Mutations in this gene cause familial juvenile nephronophthisis type 1, a kidney disorder involving both tubules and glomeruli. Defects in this gene are also associated with Senior-Loken syndrome type 1, also referred to as juvenile nephronophthisis with Leber amaurosis, which is characterized by kidney and eye disease, and with Joubert syndrome type 4, which is characterized by cerebellar ataxia, oculomotor apraxia, psychomotor delay and neonatal breathing abnormalities, sometimes including retinal dystrophy and renal disease. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.020986646).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000788 (120/152216) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00277 (115/41530). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00236. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 47 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NPHP1NM_001128178.3 linkc.953C>T p.Thr318Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 10 of 20 ENST00000445609.7 NP_001121650.1 O15259-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NPHP1ENST00000445609.7 linkc.953C>T p.Thr318Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant Exon 10 of 20 1 NM_001128178.3 ENSP00000389879.3 O15259-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000782
AC:
119
AN:
152098
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000231
AC:
58
AN:
250946
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.000177
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
135606
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000348
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000881
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000785
AC:
113
AN:
1439938
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.0000725
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
717118
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000234
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000117
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000788
AC:
120
AN:
152216
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000632
AC XY:
47
AN XY:
74392
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00277
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00142
Alfa
AF:
0.000137
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00105
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00204
AC:
9
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000264
AC:
32

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Joubert syndrome with renal defect Uncertain:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Sep 19, 2020
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. The c.1756C>T (p.R586*) variant has been previously reported as disease-causing in multiple patients [PMID 10620543, 17855640, 27806791, 25525159] -

not provided Uncertain:2
Nov 26, 2024
GeneDx
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Aug 30, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Senior-Loken syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 1 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

NPHP1-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 10, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Nephronophthisis Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.17
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.37
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.31
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.21
.;.;T;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.28
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.27
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.81
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.10
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.021
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.014
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.7
.;.;L;.;.
PrimateAI
Benign
0.32
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.3
N;N;N;D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.27
Sift
Benign
0.090
T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.14
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;P;P;P;P
Vest4
0.39
MVP
0.91
MPC
0.38
ClinPred
0.054
T
GERP RS
4.4
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.40

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0038
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.024
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140469160; hg19: chr2-110919181; API