rs140951453

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_198253.3(TERT):​c.1849C>T​(p.Leu617Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00108 in 1,613,780 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00086 ( 0 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.13
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BP6
Variant 5-1280259-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1280259-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 263104.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=6, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr5-1280259-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.13 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0011 (1611/1461408) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00277 (16/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00174. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 854 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 11 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TERTNM_198253.3 linkc.1849C>T p.Leu617Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 16 ENST00000310581.10 NP_937983.2 O14746-1
TERTNM_001193376.3 linkc.1849C>T p.Leu617Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 15 NP_001180305.1 O14746-3
TERTNR_149162.3 linkn.1928C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 13
TERTNR_149163.3 linkn.1928C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 4 of 13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TERTENST00000310581.10 linkc.1849C>T p.Leu617Leu synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 16 1 NM_198253.3 ENSP00000309572.5 O14746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000860
AC:
131
AN:
152254
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000965
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00129
AC:
324
AN:
251240
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00140
AC XY:
190
AN XY:
135878
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000636
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0115
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
1611
AN:
1461408
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00117
AC XY:
854
AN XY:
727000
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000693
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000846
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000189
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000931
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00209
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000860
AC:
131
AN:
152372
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000778
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
74522
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000962
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.0112
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000414
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00209
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.000892
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00169
EpiControl
AF:
0.00225

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Mar 28, 2018
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Dec 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

TERT: BP4, BP7 -

Aug 04, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aplastic anemia Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Melanoma, cutaneous malignant, susceptibility to, 9 Benign:1
Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Dec 07, 2020
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.83
CADD
Benign
9.0
DANN
Benign
0.61

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs140951453; hg19: chr5-1280374; COSMIC: COSV104395572; API