rs141407224
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points: 17P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2PP3_ModeratePP5_Very_Strong
The NM_004453.4(ETFDH):c.679C>A(p.Pro227Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000154 in 1,554,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely pathogenic (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P227S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004453.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 17 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004453.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETFDH | NM_004453.4 | MANE Select | c.679C>A | p.Pro227Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 13 | NP_004444.2 | ||
| ETFDH | NM_001281737.2 | c.538C>A | p.Pro180Thr | missense | Exon 5 of 12 | NP_001268666.1 | |||
| ETFDH | NM_001281738.1 | c.496C>A | p.Pro166Thr | missense | Exon 4 of 11 | NP_001268667.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETFDH | ENST00000511912.6 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.679C>A | p.Pro227Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 13 | ENSP00000426638.1 | ||
| ETFDH | ENST00000506422.1 | TSL:1 | n.87-13003C>A | intron | N/A | ||||
| ETFDH | ENST00000684622.1 | c.679C>A | p.Pro227Thr | missense | Exon 6 of 14 | ENSP00000507546.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251428 AF XY: 0.00000736 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000164 AC: 23AN: 1402792Hom.: 0 Cov.: 24 AF XY: 0.0000200 AC XY: 14AN XY: 701394 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000658 AC: 1AN: 151978Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74216 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency Pathogenic:3Uncertain:1
This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with threonine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 227 of the ETFDH protein (p.Pro227Thr). This variant is present in population databases (rs141407224, gnomAD 0.006%). This missense change has been observed in individuals with glutaric aciduria (PMID: 34066864; internal data). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 459966). Invitae Evidence Modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt ETFDH protein function with a positive predictive value of 80%. In summary, the currently available evidence indicates that the variant is pathogenic, but additional data are needed to prove that conclusively. Therefore, this variant has been classified as Likely Pathogenic.
The variant has been reported pathogenic (PS1, Ali et al. 2021, PMID: 34066864). The variant causes functional damage (PS3, clinical/biochemical evidence). The variant is rare in the healthy population (PM2 - supporting). The variant is homozygous (PM3-supporting according to the ClinGen Sequence variant interpretation Recommendation for in-trans Criterion (PM3) - Version 1.0)
not provided Pathogenic:1
ETFDH: PM2, PM3, PM5, PP4:Moderate
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at