rs141856144
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_004523.4(KIF11):c.2044C>G(p.Leu682Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000214 in 1,596,928 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004523.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF11 | NM_004523.4 | c.2044C>G | p.Leu682Val | missense_variant | 16/22 | ENST00000260731.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KIF11 | ENST00000260731.5 | c.2044C>G | p.Leu682Val | missense_variant | 16/22 | 1 | NM_004523.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00116 AC: 176AN: 152214Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000282 AC: 66AN: 234378Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000166 AC XY: 21AN XY: 126796
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000113 AC: 163AN: 1444596Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000933 AC XY: 67AN XY: 718458
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00118 AC: 179AN: 152332Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00109 AC XY: 81AN XY: 74500
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 15, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2022 | KIF11: BP4, BS1 - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | May 25, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at