rs142034311

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000257.4(MYH7):​c.4806C>T​(p.Asp1602Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 1,599,966 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00088 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYH7
NM_000257.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:24

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.95

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYH7 (HGNC:7577): (myosin heavy chain 7) Muscle myosin is a hexameric protein containing 2 heavy chain subunits, 2 alkali light chain subunits, and 2 regulatory light chain subunits. This gene encodes the beta (or slow) heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. It is expressed predominantly in normal human ventricle. It is also expressed in skeletal muscle tissues rich in slow-twitch type I muscle fibers. Changes in the relative abundance of this protein and the alpha (or fast) heavy subunit of cardiac myosin correlate with the contractile velocity of cardiac muscle. Its expression is also altered during thyroid hormone depletion and hemodynamic overloading. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, myosin storage myopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy, and Laing distal myopathy. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]
MHRT (HGNC:51291): (myosin heavy chain associated RNA transcript) This gene encodes a spliced long non-coding RNA that may act as a cardioprotective agent in the heart. Based on a study of a similar gene in mouse, the encoded transcript may regulate chromatin remodeling by acting as a decoy to the BRG1 chromatin repressor complex thus preventing it from binding to its genomic targets. Blocking the actions of BRG1 could be crucial in protecting the heart from pathological hypertrophy. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.79).
BP6
Variant 14-23416151-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23416151-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 43037.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.95 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYH7NM_000257.4 linkc.4806C>T p.Asp1602Asp synonymous_variant Exon 34 of 40 ENST00000355349.4 NP_000248.2 P12883
MYH7NM_001407004.1 linkc.4806C>T p.Asp1602Asp synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 39 NP_001393933.1
MHRTNR_126491.1 linkn.412G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 3 of 6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYH7ENST00000355349.4 linkc.4806C>T p.Asp1602Asp synonymous_variant Exon 34 of 40 1 NM_000257.4 ENSP00000347507.3 P12883
MYH7ENST00000713768.1 linkc.4806C>T p.Asp1602Asp synonymous_variant Exon 34 of 41 ENSP00000519070.1
MYH7ENST00000713769.1 linkc.4806C>T p.Asp1602Asp synonymous_variant Exon 33 of 39 ENSP00000519071.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000880
AC:
133
AN:
151070
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000387
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00650
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000265
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
266
AN:
248768
AF XY:
0.000935
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00512
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000110
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00592
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000397
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000637
AC:
923
AN:
1448776
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000604
AC XY:
436
AN XY:
721312
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00665
AC:
197
AN:
29634
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000203
AC:
9
AN:
44292
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0000383
AC:
1
AN:
26106
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000152
AC:
6
AN:
39456
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000373
AC:
32
AN:
85756
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00464
AC:
248
AN:
53410
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000699
AC:
4
AN:
5720
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000362
AC:
400
AN:
1104732
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000436
AC:
26
AN:
59670
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.376
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
61
122
184
245
306
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000880
AC:
133
AN:
151190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00127
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
73904
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00103
AC:
42
AN:
40584
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15262
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.000388
AC:
2
AN:
5156
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4810
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00650
AC:
69
AN:
10616
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000265
AC:
18
AN:
67990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2096
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.443
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
6
12
18
24
30
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000858
Hom.:
0

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:24
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 08, 2015
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Asp1602Asp in exon 34 of MYH7: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 5.9% (584/9952) of African chromos omes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs142034311). -

Dec 14, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 14, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:6
-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

MYH7: BP4, BP7 -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy Benign:3
Mar 09, 2016
CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 13, 2018
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024
All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

MYH7-related skeletal myopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Myosin storage myopathy Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Congenital myopathy with fiber type disproportion;C1834481:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1S;C1842160:Myosin storage myopathy;C1850709:Myopathy, myosin storage, autosomal recessive;C3495498:Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1;C4552004:MYH7-related skeletal myopathy Benign:1
Jul 26, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dilated Cardiomyopathy, Dominant Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jul 08, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

MYH7-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 02, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 1 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.79
CADD
Benign
0.079
DANN
Benign
0.88
PhyloP100
-4.9
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142034311; hg19: chr14-23885360; API