rs142668478
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5
The NM_006005.3(WFS1):c.2054G>A(p.Arg685His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000161 in 1,612,740 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R685C) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006005.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | NM_006005.3 | c.2054G>A | p.Arg685His | missense_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000226760.5 | |
WFS1 | NM_001145853.1 | c.2054G>A | p.Arg685His | missense_variant | 8/8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WFS1 | ENST00000226760.5 | c.2054G>A | p.Arg685His | missense_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_006005.3 | P2 | |
ENST00000661896.1 | n.1337+2066C>T | intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000176 AC: 44AN: 250084Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000192 AC XY: 26AN XY: 135280
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000164 AC: 239AN: 1460530Hom.: 0 Cov.: 98 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 117AN XY: 726612
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74354
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:5Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 20, 2018 | The R685H variant in the WFS1 gene has been observed in association with early onset diabetes; no information on hearing status was provided (Artuso et al., 2015). This variant is observed in 33/126114 (0.0262%) alleles from individuals of European (Non-Finnish) background, in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016). The R685H variant is a conservative amino acid substitution, which is not likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues share similar properties. In-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. A different missense change at this residue (R685P) has been reported as pathogenic in association with sensorineural hearing loss (Landrum et al., 2016). In summary, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 09, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Oct 13, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2017 | - - |
Hearing impairment Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Cochlear Implant Center | Apr 12, 2021 | PS1_Strong, PM2_Moderate, PM5_Moderate, PP3_Supporting - |
Wolfram-like syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | MGZ Medical Genetics Center | Oct 26, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at