Menu
GeneBe

rs143260721

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_018451.5(CENPJ):c.646T>C(p.Cys216Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000262 in 1,614,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00015 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CENPJ
NM_018451.5 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.355
Variant links:
Genes affected
CENPJ (HGNC:17272): (centromere protein J) This gene encodes a protein that belongs to the centromere protein family. During cell division, this protein plays a structural role in the maintenance of centrosome integrity and normal spindle morphology, and it is involved in microtubule disassembly at the centrosome. This protein can function as a transcriptional coactivator in the Stat5 signaling pathway, and also as a coactivator of NF-kappaB-mediated transcription, likely via its interaction with the coactivator p300/CREB-binding protein. Mutations in this gene are associated with primary autosomal recessive microcephaly, a disorder characterized by severely reduced brain size and cognitive disability. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2012]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008776218).
BP6
Variant 13-24910009-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-24910009-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 197319.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=3}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00135 (206/152326) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00438 (182/41572). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00386. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 95 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CENPJNM_018451.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.646T>C p.Cys216Arg missense_variant 4/17 ENST00000381884.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CENPJENST00000381884.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.646T>C p.Cys216Arg missense_variant 4/171 NM_018451.5 P1Q9HC77-1
CENPJENST00000616936.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.646T>C p.Cys216Arg missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 4/161 Q9HC77-2
CENPJENST00000545981.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.646T>C p.Cys216Arg missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 4/182

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00136
AC:
207
AN:
152208
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00441
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000346
AC:
87
AN:
251422
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000280
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
135876
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000405
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000879
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000489
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000148
AC:
217
AN:
1461796
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000131
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
727194
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00466
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000380
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000243
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00135
AC:
206
AN:
152326
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00128
AC XY:
95
AN XY:
74484
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.000325
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00141
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00409
AC:
18
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000346
AC:
42

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 02, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 17, 2014- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 26, 2016- -
Microcephaly 6, primary, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Seckel syndrome 4 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJul 06, 2021This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
CENPJ-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesFeb 24, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.060
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.70
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
Cadd
Benign
1.6
Dann
Benign
0.28
Eigen
Benign
-1.2
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.2
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.00052
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.14
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0019
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0088
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.96
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.76
N;N;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.70
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0
.;B;.
Vest4
0.082
MVP
0.10
MPC
0.22
ClinPred
0.00046
T
GERP RS
0.81
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.045
gMVP
0.17

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143260721; hg19: chr13-25484147; API