rs143710815

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_194454.3(KRIT1):​c.1095A>G​(p.Gly365Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00353 in 1,613,262 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0037 ( 13 hom. )

Consequence

KRIT1
NM_194454.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.699
Variant links:
Genes affected
KRIT1 (HGNC:1573): (KRIT1 ankyrin repeat containing) This gene encodes a protein containing four ankyrin repeats, a band 4.1/ezrin/radixin/moesin (FERM) domain, and multiple NPXY sequences. The encoded protein is localized in the nucleus and cytoplasm. It binds to integrin cytoplasmic domain-associated protein-1 alpha (ICAP1alpha), and plays a critical role in beta1-integrin-mediated cell proliferation. It associates with junction proteins and RAS-related protein 1A (Rap1A), which requires the encoded protein for maintaining the integrity of endothelial junctions. It is also a microtubule-associated protein and may play a role in microtubule targeting. Mutations in this gene result in cerebral cavernous malformations. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.55).
BP6
Variant 7-92226577-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-92226577-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 263092.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr7-92226577-T-C is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.699 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00228 (347/152312) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00413 (281/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00373. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 155 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 347 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KRIT1NM_194454.3 linkc.1095A>G p.Gly365Gly synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 19 ENST00000394505.7 NP_919436.1 O00522-1A4D1F7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KRIT1ENST00000394505.7 linkc.1095A>G p.Gly365Gly synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 19 1 NM_194454.3 ENSP00000378013.2 O00522-1
ENSG00000289027ENST00000692281.1 linkc.1095A>G p.Gly365Gly synonymous_variant Exon 11 of 26 ENSP00000510568.1 A0A8I5KWQ7
ENSG00000285953ENST00000458493.6 linkc.1095A>G p.Gly365Gly synonymous_variant Exon 10 of 20 4 ENSP00000396352.2 C9JD81

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00228
AC:
347
AN:
152194
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000942
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00413
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00203
AC:
509
AN:
251328
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00176
AC XY:
239
AN XY:
135846
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00153
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000993
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000601
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00372
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00366
AC:
5346
AN:
1460950
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00347
AC XY:
2521
AN XY:
726882
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000389
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00145
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000383
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000464
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00358
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00228
AC:
347
AN:
152312
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00208
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
74478
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000942
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00413
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00236
Alfa
AF:
0.00283
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00227
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00414
EpiControl
AF:
0.00367

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

May 27, 2019
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

ENSG00000289027: BS2; KRIT1: BP4, BP7, BS2 -

Nov 09, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cerebral cavernous malformation Benign:3
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nov 04, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Apr 04, 2022
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum with arteriovenous fistulas Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.55
CADD
Benign
9.6
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143710815; hg19: chr7-91855891; API