rs144140159
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_015100.4(POGZ):c.1895A>T(p.Asn632Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000434 in 1,612,870 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N632S) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015100.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual disability-microcephaly-strabismus-behavioral abnormalities syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina, G2P, Orphanet, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151790Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000411 AC: 6AN: 1461080Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726870 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000659 AC: 1AN: 151790Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000135 AC XY: 1AN XY: 74090 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.1895A>T (p.N632I) alteration is located in exon 12 (coding exon 11) of the POGZ gene. This alteration results from a A to T substitution at nucleotide position 1895, causing the asparagine (N) at amino acid position 632 to be replaced by an isoleucine (I). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
POGZ-related disorder Uncertain:1
The POGZ c.1895A>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Asn632Ile. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature or in a large population database (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org), indicating this variant is rare. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at