Menu
GeneBe

rs144310369

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 3P and 13B. PM2PP3BP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1

The NM_198253.3(TERT):c.2520G>A(p.Leu840=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000307 in 1,613,460 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L840L) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00042 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

TERT
NM_198253.3 synonymous

Scores

1
1

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.304
Variant links:
Genes affected
TERT (HGNC:11730): (telomerase reverse transcriptase) Telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein polymerase that maintains telomere ends by addition of the telomere repeat TTAGGG. The enzyme consists of a protein component with reverse transcriptase activity, encoded by this gene, and an RNA component which serves as a template for the telomere repeat. Telomerase expression plays a role in cellular senescence, as it is normally repressed in postnatal somatic cells resulting in progressive shortening of telomeres. Deregulation of telomerase expression in somatic cells may be involved in oncogenesis. Studies in mouse suggest that telomerase also participates in chromosomal repair, since de novo synthesis of telomere repeats may occur at double-stranded breaks. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms of telomerase reverse transcriptase have been identified; the full-length sequence of some variants has not been determined. Alternative splicing at this locus is thought to be one mechanism of regulation of telomerase activity. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
BayesDel_noAF computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.23
BP6
Variant 5-1268582-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-1268582-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 263108.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.304 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00042 (64/152380) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0108 (56/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00854. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 40 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TERTNM_198253.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2520G>A p.Leu840= synonymous_variant 9/16 ENST00000310581.10
TERTNM_001193376.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2520G>A p.Leu840= synonymous_variant 9/15
TERTNR_149162.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.2417G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/13
TERTNR_149163.3 linkuse as main transcriptn.2381G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 7/13

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TERTENST00000310581.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.2520G>A p.Leu840= synonymous_variant 9/161 NM_198253.3 P2O14746-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000427
AC:
65
AN:
152262
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000827
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000987
AC:
247
AN:
250278
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00108
AC XY:
147
AN XY:
135616
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0119
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000532
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000327
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000296
AC:
432
AN:
1461080
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000307
AC XY:
223
AN XY:
726804
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00844
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000672
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000190
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000232
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000420
AC:
64
AN:
152380
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000537
AC XY:
40
AN XY:
74512
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000653
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0108
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000828
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000199
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000450
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 07, 2018- -
Aplastic anemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis;C3151443:Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;C0265965:Dyskeratosis congenita Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 12, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Dyskeratosis congenita, autosomal dominant 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Pulmonary fibrosis and/or bone marrow failure, Telomere-related, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.23
Cadd
Benign
3.7
Dann
Benign
0.96

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144310369; hg19: chr5-1268697; API