rs144320036
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):c.139C>T(p.Pro47Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000973 in 1,551,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_016938.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | NM_016938.5 | c.139C>T | p.Pro47Ser | missense_variant | 3/11 | ENST00000307998.11 | NP_058634.4 | |
EFEMP2 | NR_037718.2 | n.264C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/12 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFEMP2 | ENST00000307998.11 | c.139C>T | p.Pro47Ser | missense_variant | 3/11 | 1 | NM_016938.5 | ENSP00000309953 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00103 AC: 156AN: 152068Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000971 AC: 152AN: 156514Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00107 AC XY: 88AN XY: 82346
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000968 AC: 1354AN: 1399400Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 710AN XY: 690224
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00103 AC: 156AN: 152186Hom.: 2 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000981 AC XY: 73AN XY: 74408
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 23, 2022 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27339457) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | EFEMP2: BP4, BS2 - |
Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 25, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 09, 2023 | The EFEMP2 c.139C>T; p.Pro47Ser variant (rs144320036), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 390442). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.104% (195/187,840 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The proline at codon 47 is moderately conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.213). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Pro47Ser variant is uncertain at this time. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Oct 19, 2023 | Variant summary: EFEMP2 c.139C>T (p.Pro47Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00097 in 156514 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in EFEMP2 causing Autosomal Recessive Cutis Laxa phenotype (0.00071), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.139C>T in individuals affected with Autosomal Recessive Cutis Laxa and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. At least one publication reports experimental evidence that this variant has no damaging effect on protein function (example: Sasaki_2016). The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27339457). Six submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 07, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
EFEMP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 15, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at