rs144320036

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_016938.5(EFEMP2):​c.139C>T​(p.Pro47Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000973 in 1,551,586 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0010 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00097 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

EFEMP2
NM_016938.5 missense

Scores

2
17

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0220
Variant links:
Genes affected
EFEMP2 (HGNC:3219): (EGF containing fibulin extracellular matrix protein 2) A large number of extracellular matrix proteins have been found to contain variations of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and have been implicated in functions as diverse as blood coagulation, activation of complement and determination of cell fate during development. The protein encoded by this gene contains four EGF2 domains and six calcium-binding EGF2 domains. This gene is necessary for elastic fiber formation and connective tissue development. Defects in this gene are cause of an autosomal recessive cutis laxa syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008275986).
BP6
Variant 11-65871991-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-65871991-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 390442.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr11-65871991-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
EFEMP2NM_016938.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.139C>T p.Pro47Ser missense_variant 3/11 ENST00000307998.11 NP_058634.4
EFEMP2NR_037718.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.264C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 3/12

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
EFEMP2ENST00000307998.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.139C>T p.Pro47Ser missense_variant 3/111 NM_016938.5 ENSP00000309953 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00103
AC:
156
AN:
152068
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00176
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000958
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000971
AC:
152
AN:
156514
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.00107
AC XY:
88
AN XY:
82346
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000566
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000352
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000922
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000130
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00170
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00181
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000968
AC:
1354
AN:
1399400
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00103
AC XY:
710
AN XY:
690224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000633
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000840
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000437
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000644
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000244
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00105
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00103
AC:
156
AN:
152186
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000981
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00144
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00177
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000948
Alfa
AF:
0.00164
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00113
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000246
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00138
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.000483
AC:
36

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 23, 2022This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 27339457) -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenFeb 01, 2024EFEMP2: BP4, BS2 -
Cutis laxa, autosomal recessive, type 1B Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 25, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesOct 09, 2023The EFEMP2 c.139C>T; p.Pro47Ser variant (rs144320036), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 390442). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.104% (195/187,840 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The proline at codon 47 is moderately conserved, and computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.213). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Pro47Ser variant is uncertain at this time. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpOct 19, 2023Variant summary: EFEMP2 c.139C>T (p.Pro47Ser) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00097 in 156514 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0017 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 2 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in EFEMP2 causing Autosomal Recessive Cutis Laxa phenotype (0.00071), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.139C>T in individuals affected with Autosomal Recessive Cutis Laxa and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. At least one publication reports experimental evidence that this variant has no damaging effect on protein function (example: Sasaki_2016). The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 27339457). Six submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as likely benign (n=5) and VUS (n=1). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 07, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
EFEMP2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 15, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.087
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.23
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.055
T;D;.;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.70
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.54
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.49
N
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.89
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.022
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0083
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.81
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.86
.;L;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
0.91
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.41
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.7
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.21
Sift
Benign
0.25
T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.61
T;T;.;T
Polyphen
0.022
B;B;.;.
Vest4
0.096
MVP
0.79
MPC
0.36
ClinPred
0.012
T
GERP RS
0.67
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.11
gMVP
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144320036; hg19: chr11-65639462; API