rs144425830

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 4P and 11B. PM1PP2PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000458.4(HNF1B):​c.226G>T​(p.Gly76Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000399 in 1,613,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

HNF1B
NM_000458.4 missense

Scores

9
4
2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
HNF1B (HGNC:11630): (HNF1 homeobox B) This gene encodes a member of the homeodomain-containing superfamily of transcription factors. The protein binds to DNA as either a homodimer, or a heterodimer with the related protein hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha. The gene has been shown to function in nephron development, and regulates development of the embryonic pancreas. Mutations in this gene result in renal cysts and diabetes syndrome and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and expression of this gene is altered in some types of cancer. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 6 uncertain in NM_000458.4
PP2
Missense variant in the gene, where a lot of missense mutations are associated with disease in ClinVar. The gene has 72 curated pathogenic missense variants (we use a threshold of 10). The gene has 9 curated benign missense variants. Trascript score misZ: 2.0703 (below the threshold of 3.09). GenCC associations: The gene is linked to medullary sponge kidney, renal dysplasia, unilateral, renal hypomagnesemia 2, transient neonatal diabetes mellitus, renal dysplasia, bilateral, renal cysts and diabetes syndrome, unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney, diabetes mellitus, noninsulin-dependent, permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, REVEL [when max_spliceai, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15736353).
BP6
Variant 17-37744659-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-37744659-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193102.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=4, Likely_benign=6, Benign=1}. Variant chr17-37744659-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000623 (95/152370) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00274 (42/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 52 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position FAILED quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 95 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
HNF1BNM_000458.4 linkc.226G>T p.Gly76Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 ENST00000617811.5 NP_000449.1 P35680-1Q6FHW6

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
HNF1BENST00000617811.5 linkc.226G>T p.Gly76Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 1 NM_000458.4 ENSP00000480291.1 P35680-1
HNF1BENST00000621123.4 linkc.226G>T p.Gly76Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 9 1 ENSP00000482711.1 P35680-2
HNF1BENST00000613727.4 linkc.226G>T p.Gly76Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 7 1 ENSP00000477524.1 A0A0C4DGS8
HNF1BENST00000614313.4 linkc.226G>T p.Gly76Cys missense_variant Exon 1 of 8 5 ENSP00000482529.1 A0A087WZC2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000617
AC:
94
AN:
152252
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0158
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000367
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000575
AC:
144
AN:
250430
AF XY:
0.000634
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000618
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000471
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000371
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00196
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000375
AC:
548
AN:
1460808
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000359
AC XY:
261
AN XY:
726774
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
AC:
10
AN:
33478
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00208
AC:
93
AN:
44716
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26126
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000580
AC:
5
AN:
86256
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52388
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000328
AC:
365
AN:
1111988
Gnomad4 Remaining exome
AF:
0.00106
AC:
64
AN:
60390
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
37
74
110
147
184
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000623
AC:
95
AN:
152370
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000698
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000409
AC:
0.000408673
AN:
0.000408673
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00274
AC:
0.00274402
AN:
0.00274402
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
0
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
0.0000940734
AN:
0.0000940734
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000367
AC:
0.000367463
AN:
0.000367463
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
AC:
0.00189036
AN:
0.00189036
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
9
13
18
22
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000422
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000846
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000681
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000233
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
0.000445
AC:
54
EpiCase
AF:
0.000763
EpiControl
AF:
0.000948

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:3
Jan 14, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 23, 2018
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 16, 2022
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Identified in multiple patients with structural renal abnormalities, however, family segregation studies have been limited, functional studies have not been performed, and only the HNF1B gene was sequenced in most publications (Ulinski et al., 2006; Nakayama et al., 2010; Musetti et al., 2014, Raaijmakers et al., 2015; Okorn et al., 2019); Identified in an individual with maturity-onset diabetes of the young, however, additional clinical and segregation information was not provided (Bellanne-Chatelot et al., 2005); Identified in randomly selected individuals from the Framingham and Jackson Heart Studies (Flannick et al., 2013); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21775974, 24097065, 24387224, 20155289, 26764160, 25500806, 16249435, 30666461, 16371430, 31365591, 34426522, 33324081) -

Nov 15, 2023
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

BS1, PP3 -

Renal cysts and diabetes syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Jul 06, 2019
Institute of Human Genetics, FAU Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:literature only

- -

May 31, 2018
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

This variant is interpreted as a Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence, for Renal cysts and diabetes syndrome, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder (PMID:23539225). PP3 => Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product. -

Feb 01, 2025
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:3
Jun 04, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

HNF1B-related disorder Benign:1
Jan 29, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Jul 07, 2023
KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital anomaly of kidney and urinary tract Benign:1
Oct 25, 2018
Sydney Genome Diagnostics, Children's Hospital Westmead
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.60
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.13
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.41
CADD
Pathogenic
33
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.96
D;.;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.80
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.93
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.16
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
1.1
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.6
M;M;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.83
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0090
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.58
MVP
0.98
ClinPred
0.061
T
GERP RS
5.1
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.59
gMVP
0.74
Mutation Taster
=24/76
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144425830; hg19: chr17-36104650; API