rs144425830
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points: 3P and 11B. PM1PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_000458.4(HNF1B):c.226G>T(p.Gly76Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000399 in 1,613,178 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
HNF1B
NM_000458.4 missense
NM_000458.4 missense
Scores
9
4
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.68
Genes affected
HNF1B (HGNC:11630): (HNF1 homeobox B) This gene encodes a member of the homeodomain-containing superfamily of transcription factors. The protein binds to DNA as either a homodimer, or a heterodimer with the related protein hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-alpha. The gene has been shown to function in nephron development, and regulates development of the embryonic pancreas. Mutations in this gene result in renal cysts and diabetes syndrome and noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and expression of this gene is altered in some types of cancer. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -8 ACMG points.
PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 4 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 2 benign, 5 uncertain in NM_000458.4
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI [when max_spliceai, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.15736353).
BP6
Variant 17-37744659-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-37744659-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193102.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr17-37744659-C-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000623 (95/152370) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00274 (42/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 52 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 95 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNF1B | NM_000458.4 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Cys | missense_variant | 1/9 | ENST00000617811.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HNF1B | ENST00000617811.5 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Cys | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | NM_000458.4 | ||
HNF1B | ENST00000621123.4 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Cys | missense_variant | 1/9 | 1 | P1 | ||
HNF1B | ENST00000613727.4 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Cys | missense_variant | 1/7 | 1 | |||
HNF1B | ENST00000614313.4 | c.226G>T | p.Gly76Cys | missense_variant | 1/8 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000617 AC: 94AN: 152252Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
94
AN:
152252
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000575 AC: 144AN: 250430Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000634 AC XY: 86AN XY: 135656
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
144
AN:
250430
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
135656
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000375 AC: 548AN: 1460808Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000359 AC XY: 261AN XY: 726774
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
548
AN:
1460808
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
261
AN XY:
726774
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000623 AC: 95AN: 152370Hom.: 1 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000698 AC XY: 52AN XY: 74516
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
95
AN:
152370
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
74516
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
3
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
2
ExAC
AF:
AC:
54
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 16, 2022 | Identified in multiple patients with structural renal abnormalities, however, family segregation studies have been limited, functional studies have not been performed, and only the HNF1B gene was sequenced in most publications (Ulinski et al., 2006; Nakayama et al., 2010; Musetti et al., 2014, Raaijmakers et al., 2015; Okorn et al., 2019); Identified in an individual with maturity-onset diabetes of the young, however, additional clinical and segregation information was not provided (Bellanne-Chatelot et al., 2005); Identified in randomly selected individuals from the Framingham and Jackson Heart Studies (Flannick et al., 2013); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21775974, 24097065, 24387224, 20155289, 26764160, 25500806, 16249435, 30666461, 16371430, 31365591, 34426522, 33324081) - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 16, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Nov 23, 2018 | - - |
Renal cysts and diabetes syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | literature only | Institute of Human Genetics, FAU Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg | Jul 06, 2019 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics | May 31, 2018 | This variant is interpreted as a Uncertain Significance - Conflicting Evidence, for Renal cysts and diabetes syndrome, in Autosomal Dominant manner. The following ACMG Tag(s) were applied: BS1 => Allele frequency is greater than expected for disorder (PMID:23539225). PP3 => Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect on the gene or gene product. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 27, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 04, 2015 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 22, 2023 | - - |
HNF1B-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 29, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Nonpapillary renal cell carcinoma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Congenital anomaly of kidney and urinary tract Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Sydney Genome Diagnostics, Children's Hospital Westmead | Oct 25, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
D
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D;.;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
M;M;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
D;.;.;.;.;.
Vest4
MVP
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at