rs144486524

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001378454.1(ALMS1):​c.10751A>T​(p.Gln3584Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000512 in 1,614,090 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Q3584E) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0029 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

ALMS1
NM_001378454.1 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.425

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
ALMS1 (HGNC:428): (ALMS1 centrosome and basal body associated protein) This gene encodes a protein containing a large tandem-repeat domain as well as additional low complexity regions. The encoded protein functions in microtubule organization, particularly in the formation and maintanance of cilia. Mutations in this gene cause Alstrom syndrome. There is a pseudogene for this gene located adjacent in the same region of chromosome 2. Alternative splice variants have been described but their full length nature has not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, Apr 2014]
ALMS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Alstrom syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0055217743).
BP6
Variant 2-73572628-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-73572628-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 235538.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00286 (436/152362) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.00991 (412/41590). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00912. There are 4 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 192 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ALMS1NM_001378454.1 linkc.10751A>T p.Gln3584Leu missense_variant Exon 16 of 23 ENST00000613296.6 NP_001365383.1
ALMS1NM_015120.4 linkc.10751A>T p.Gln3584Leu missense_variant Exon 16 of 23 NP_055935.4 Q8TCU4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ALMS1ENST00000613296.6 linkc.10751A>T p.Gln3584Leu missense_variant Exon 16 of 23 1 NM_001378454.1 ENSP00000482968.1 Q8TCU4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00286
AC:
436
AN:
152244
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00994
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00118
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000659
AC:
164
AN:
248684
AF XY:
0.000482
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00944
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000436
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000177
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000166
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000267
AC:
390
AN:
1461728
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000230
AC XY:
167
AN XY:
727162
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00917
AC:
307
AN:
33476
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000537
AC:
24
AN:
44684
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26130
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39684
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53378
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.000693
AC:
4
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00000450
AC:
5
AN:
1111966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000811
AC:
49
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
23
47
70
94
117
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00286
AC:
436
AN:
152362
Hom.:
4
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00258
AC XY:
192
AN XY:
74500
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00991
AC:
412
AN:
41590
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00118
AC:
18
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5190
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10630
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000147
AC:
1
AN:
68038
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00236
AC:
5
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
21
42
64
85
106
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000517
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00317
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00998
AC:
39
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000728
AC:
88
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Mar 11, 2021
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: ALMS1 c.10748A>T (p.Gln3583Leu) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00066 in 248684 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0094 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 4 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in ALMS1 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.0022), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.10748A>T in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Mar 21, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

p.Gln3583Leu in exon 16 of ALMS1: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.87% (84/9696) of African chromo somes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs144486524). -

Nov 15, 2017
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 07, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Aug 26, 2015
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2023
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

ALMS1: BP4, BS2 -

May 18, 2020
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Alstrom syndrome Benign:2
-
Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Potent mutations in ALMS1 are associated with a rare condition called Alstrom syndrome. It can cause excessive eating, insulin resistance. However, no evidence is found to ascertain the role of rs144486524 in Alstrom syndrome yet. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Feb 09, 2018
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG criteria: BS2 (type2diabetesgenetics.org), BP4 (6 predictors), BP1 (most causal variants are truncating variants), Note:similar MAF in TODAY/1000G=likely benign -

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Jan 23, 2019
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.48
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
6.0
DANN
Benign
0.86
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.047
T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.89
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.95
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.11
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.59
T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0024
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0055
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.98
T
PhyloP100
0.42
PrimateAI
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.34
T;T;T
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.12
ClinPred
0.0068
T
GERP RS
-1.3
Varity_R
0.042
gMVP
0.090
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144486524; hg19: chr2-73799755; API