rs144574441
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.8351C>T(p.Pro2784Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00257 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 111 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001999.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | NM_001999.4 | c.8351C>T | p.Pro2784Leu | missense_variant | 64/65 | ENST00000262464.9 | |
FBN2 | XM_017009228.3 | c.8198C>T | p.Pro2733Leu | missense_variant | 63/64 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBN2 | ENST00000262464.9 | c.8351C>T | p.Pro2784Leu | missense_variant | 64/65 | 1 | NM_001999.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00148 AC: 225AN: 152218Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00543 AC: 1364AN: 251162Hom.: 44 AF XY: 0.00742 AC XY: 1007AN XY: 135720
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00268 AC: 3916AN: 1461824Hom.: 106 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00384 AC XY: 2793AN XY: 727214
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00148 AC: 225AN: 152336Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00215 AC XY: 160AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 30, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 29, 2017 | Variant summary: The FBN2 c.8351C>T (p.Pro2784Leu) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a missense substitution. The variant does not lie within a known functional domain (InterPro) and 4/5 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in the large control database ExAC in 759 of 121388 control chromosomes (26 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the South Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.04524 (747/16512). This frequency is about 36192 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic FBN2 variant (0.0000013), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of South Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. To our knowledge, the variant of interest has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 31, 2022 | - - |
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 05, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 30, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | Dec 24, 2021 | - - |
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children | May 13, 2022 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at