rs144717157

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000166.6(GJB1):​c.235C>T​(p.Leu79Leu) variant causes a synonymous change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00246 in 1,203,224 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. There are 924 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., 55 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0025 ( 3 hom. 869 hem. )

Consequence

GJB1
NM_000166.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:2B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.00
Variant links:
Genes affected
GJB1 (HGNC:4283): (gap junction protein beta 1) This gene encodes a member of the gap junction protein family. The gap junction proteins are membrane-spanning proteins that assemble to form gap junction channels that facilitate the transfer of ions and small molecules between cells. According to sequence similarities at the nucleotide and amino acid levels, the gap junction proteins are divided into two categories, alpha and beta. Mutations in this gene cause X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, an inherited peripheral neuropathy. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).
BP6
Variant X-71223942-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-71223942-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 220932.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-71223942-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-71223942-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00184 (205/111213) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00266 (141/52947). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00231. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 55 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 22. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 55 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GJB1NM_000166.6 linkc.235C>T p.Leu79Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 ENST00000361726.7 NP_000157.1 P08034A0A654ICJ7
GJB1NM_001097642.3 linkc.235C>T p.Leu79Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 NP_001091111.1 P08034A0A654ICJ7
GJB1XM_011530907.3 linkc.235C>T p.Leu79Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 XP_011529209.1 P08034A0A654ICJ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GJB1ENST00000361726.7 linkc.235C>T p.Leu79Leu synonymous_variant Exon 2 of 2 1 NM_000166.6 ENSP00000354900.6 P08034

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00184
AC:
205
AN:
111161
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00165
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
33393
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000384
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00944
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00200
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00237
AC:
396
AN:
167208
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00216
AC XY:
117
AN XY:
54224
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000408
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000812
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00721
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00463
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00328
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00283
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00252
AC:
2752
AN:
1092011
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00243
AC XY:
869
AN XY:
358185
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000494
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000817
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00904
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00496
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00268
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00183
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
205
AN:
111213
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00164
AC XY:
55
AN XY:
33455
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000383
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00944
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00266
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00197
Alfa
AF:
0.00359
Hom.:
27
Bravo
AF:
0.00160

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2020
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease X-linked dominant 1 Benign:3
Apr 27, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

May 18, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 27, 2021
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
-
Inherited Neuropathy Consortium
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: flagged submission
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Dec 22, 2016
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Dejerine-Sottas disease Uncertain:1
-
Inherited Neuropathy Consortium
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Oct 21, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy X Benign:1
Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

GJB1-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 24, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.51
CADD
Benign
8.6
DANN
Benign
0.72

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144717157; hg19: chrX-70443792; API