rs144856889
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2
The NM_000465.4(BARD1):c.346C>T(p.His116Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000249 in 1,613,432 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000465.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152014Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000291 AC: 73AN: 251012Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000265 AC XY: 36AN XY: 135670
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000246 AC: 360AN: 1461300Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000234 AC XY: 170AN XY: 726930
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000270 AC: 41AN: 152132Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000309 AC XY: 23AN XY: 74386
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial cancer of breast Uncertain:3Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 17, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Myriad Genetics, Inc. | Feb 24, 2023 | This variant is considered likely benign. This variant is strongly associated with less severe personal and family histories of cancer, typical for individuals without pathogenic variants in this gene [PMID: 25085752]. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Apr 28, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases did not allow this variant to be ruled in or out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as a variant of unknown significance. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 30, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 29, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 23, 2019 | Variant summary: BARD1 c.346C>T (p.His116Tyr) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00031 in 282296 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00033 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within Non-Finnish European control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.32 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BARD1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.00025), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of Non-Finnish European origin. c.346C>T has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Colorectal Cancer, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (Lee_2015, Mu_2016, Tung_2015, Young_2016, Yurgelun_2017, Chaffee_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function. These results showed no damaging effect of this variant (Lee_2015). Five ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cites the variant three times as likely benign and twice as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Jul 31, 2024 | - - |
BARD1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | May 24, 2024 | The BARD1 c.346C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.His116Tyr. This variant has been reported in patients with various cancers, and classified as a variant of uncertain significance (Lee et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 26350354; Yurgelun et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28135145). However, no further information was provided regarding the segregation of this variant with disease in families or evidence of its pathogenicity. This variant is reported in 0.17% of alleles in individuals of European (Finnish) descent in gnomAD. This variant has been reported with conflicting interpretations in ClinVar: variant of uncertain significance (3), likely benign (6) and benign (1) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/405796/). Although we suspect this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 02, 2021 | In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23056176, 26350354, 26787654, 27720647, 28873162, 28726808, 28135145) - |
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BARD1 p.His116Tyr variant was identified in 1 of 604 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.002) from individuals with pancreatic cancer (Chaffee 2018). The variant was identified in dbSNP (rs144856889) as “with other allele” and ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Invitae, Ambry Genetics, Integrated Genetics and Color; and as uncertain significance by Counsyl and GeneDx). The variant was identified in control databases in 88 of 282,296 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0003 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: Finnish in 42 of 25,062 chromosomes (freq: 0.002), Other in 3 of 7196 chromosomes (freq: 0.0004), and European in 42 of 128,918 chromosomes (freq: 0.0003), while the variant was not observed in the African, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian or South Asian populations. In vitro expression of the variant did not alter BARD1 protein levels and there was no observed effect on homology directed repair activity (Lee 2015). The p.His116 residue is conserved in in mammals but not in more distantly related organisms however computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) do not suggest a high likelihood of impact to the protein; this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at