rs144877595
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points: 0P and 17B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2
The NM_015141.4(GPD1L):c.981G>A(p.Val327=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000346 in 1,601,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0018 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 3 hom. )
Consequence
GPD1L
NM_015141.4 synonymous
NM_015141.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.45
Genes affected
GPD1L (HGNC:28956): (glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 like) The protein encoded by this gene catalyzes the conversion of sn-glycerol 3-phosphate to glycerone phosphate. The encoded protein is found in the cytoplasm, associated with the plasma membrane, where it binds the sodium channel, voltage-gated, type V, alpha subunit (SCN5A). Defects in this gene are a cause of Brugada syndrome type 2 (BRS2) as well as sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -17 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 3-32165835-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-32165835-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 137491.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr3-32165835-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.45 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 276 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPD1L | NM_015141.4 | c.981G>A | p.Val327= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | ENST00000282541.10 | NP_055956.1 | |
GPD1L | XM_006713068.3 | c.840G>A | p.Val280= | synonymous_variant | 7/7 | XP_006713131.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPD1L | ENST00000282541.10 | c.981G>A | p.Val327= | synonymous_variant | 8/8 | 1 | NM_015141.4 | ENSP00000282541 | P1 | |
GPD1L | ENST00000474846.5 | n.905G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 2 | |||||
GPD1L | ENST00000496151.1 | n.482G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00177 AC: 270AN: 152166Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
270
AN:
152166
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000529 AC: 133AN: 251460Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000419 AC XY: 57AN XY: 135902
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
133
AN:
251460
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
135902
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000192 AC: 278AN: 1449280Hom.: 3 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.000190 AC XY: 137AN XY: 721906
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
278
AN:
1449280
Hom.:
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
AC XY:
137
AN XY:
721906
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00181 AC: 276AN: 152284Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00185 AC XY: 138AN XY: 74458
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
276
AN:
152284
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
138
AN XY:
74458
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
1
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 08, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jun 13, 2020 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
GPD1L-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 31, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Brugada syndrome 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Jun 30, 2022 | - - |
Brugada syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 10, 2015 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at