rs144926928

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000238.4(KCNH2):c.1320G>T(p.Pro440Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000287 in 1,614,166 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00031 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00029 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

KCNH2
NM_000238.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.796

Variant links:

Genes affected

KCNH2 (HGNC:6251): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily H member 2) This gene encodes a component of a voltage-activated potassium channel found in cardiac muscle, nerve cells, and microglia. Four copies of this protein interact with one copy of the KCNE2 protein to form a functional potassium channel. Mutations in this gene can cause long QT syndrome type 2 (LQT2). Transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

KCNH2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.8).

BP6

Variant 7-150952662-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-150952662-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 215441.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr7-150952662-C-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.796 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000285 (417/1461886) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.016 (92/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0133. There are 7 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 227 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 47 AD,Digenic gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
KCNH2	NM_000238.4 link	c.1320G>T	p.Pro440Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 15	ENST00000262186.10	NP_000229.1	Q12809-1Q15BH2A0A090N8Q0

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
KCNH2	ENST00000262186.10 link	c.1320G>T	p.Pro440Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 15	1	NM_000238.4	ENSP00000262186.5		Q12809-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152162

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000483

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000524

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000827

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0411

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000346

AC:

AN:

251476

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000390

AC XY:

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000376

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000510

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000285

AC:

417

AN:

1461886

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000312

AC XY:

227

AN XY:

727248

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000179

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000447

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000313

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000210

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000629

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

152280

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000322

AC XY:

AN XY:

74448

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000481

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000828

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000221

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00236

Alfa

AF:

0.000280

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000295

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.000711

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 08, 2019

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

KCNH2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Jan 16, 2017

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Long QT syndrome 2

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified

Benign:1

Nov 21, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Sep 21, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Cardiac arrhythmia

Benign:1

Sep 28, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.80

CADD

Benign

0.88

DANN

Benign

0.52

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over