rs145061343

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_006517.5(SLC16A2):​c.412C>G​(p.Gln138Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000616 in 1,208,073 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 256 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00033 ( 0 hom., 12 hem., cov: 24)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00065 ( 0 hom. 244 hem. )

Consequence

SLC16A2
NM_006517.5 missense

Scores

2
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.40

Publications

4 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC16A2 (HGNC:10923): (solute carrier family 16 member 2) This gene encodes an integral membrane protein that functions as a transporter of thyroid hormone. The encoded protein facilitates the cellular importation of thyroxine (T4), triiodothyronine (T3), reverse triiodothyronine (rT3) and diidothyronine (T2). This gene is expressed in many tissues and likely plays an important role in the development of the central nervous system. Loss of function mutations in this gene are associated with psychomotor retardation in males while females exhibit no neurological defects and more moderate thyroid-deficient phenotypes. This gene is subject to X-chromosome inactivation. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Allan-Herndon-Dudley syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Mar 2012]
SLC16A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Allan-Herndon-Dudley syndrome
    Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, G2P, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.03798276).
BP6
Variant X-74422049-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-74422049-C-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 95421.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000328 (37/112942) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000563 (30/53320). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000404. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 12 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 24. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 12 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC16A2NM_006517.5 linkc.412C>G p.Gln138Glu missense_variant Exon 1 of 6 ENST00000587091.6 NP_006508.2 P36021

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC16A2ENST00000587091.6 linkc.412C>G p.Gln138Glu missense_variant Exon 1 of 6 1 NM_006517.5 ENSP00000465734.1 P36021
SLC16A2ENST00000636771.1 linkn.157C>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 1 of 7 5 ENSP00000490445.1 A0A1B0GVB4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000328
AC:
37
AN:
112942
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
24
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000642
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000185
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000563
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00198
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000442
AC:
77
AN:
174327
AF XY:
0.000403
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000825
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000445
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000782
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000918
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000646
AC:
707
AN:
1095131
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000675
AC XY:
244
AN XY:
361493
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000380
AC:
1
AN:
26345
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000428
AC:
15
AN:
35063
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
19331
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
30174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000187
AC:
1
AN:
53611
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000495
AC:
2
AN:
40379
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2963
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000762
AC:
641
AN:
841327
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00102
AC:
47
AN:
45938
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.464
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
26
51
77
102
128
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
26
52
78
104
130
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000328
AC:
37
AN:
112942
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
24
AF XY:
0.000342
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
35078
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000642
AC:
2
AN:
31145
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000185
AC:
2
AN:
10800
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2661
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3545
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2781
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
6254
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
237
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000563
AC:
30
AN:
53320
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
3
AN:
1516
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.459
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000497
Hom.:
11
Bravo
AF:
0.000461
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00119
AC:
8
ExAC
AF:
0.000511
AC:
62

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Jul 02, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 07, 2017
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

SLC16A2: BP4, BS2 -

Hereditary spastic paraplegia Uncertain:1
Dec 30, 2016
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Spastic paraplegia Benign:1
Oct 16, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Sep 26, 2017
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Intellectual disability Benign:1
Jan 01, 2019
Centre de Biologie Pathologie Génétique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

SLC16A2-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 26, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.062
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.40
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.42
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.66
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
T
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.78
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.64
T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.12
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.038
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.14
N
PhyloP100
2.4
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.84
T
Polyphen
0.0040
B
Vest4
0.19
MVP
0.32
MPC
1.0
ClinPred
0.0096
T
GERP RS
4.2
Varity_R
0.18
gMVP
0.72
Mutation Taster
=83/17
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145061343; hg19: chrX-73641884; COSMIC: COSV99330530; API