rs145798106

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7

The NM_020975.6(RET):​c.2988G>A​(p.Pro996=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000107 in 1,614,092 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00010 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

RET
NM_020975.6 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.624
Variant links:
Genes affected
RET (HGNC:9967): (ret proto-oncogene) This gene encodes a transmembrane receptor and member of the tyrosine protein kinase family of proteins. Binding of ligands such as GDNF (glial cell-line derived neurotrophic factor) and other related proteins to the encoded receptor stimulates receptor dimerization and activation of downstream signaling pathways that play a role in cell differentiation, growth, migration and survival. The encoded receptor is important in development of the nervous system, and the development of organs and tissues derived from the neural crest. This proto-oncogene can undergo oncogenic activation through both cytogenetic rearrangement and activating point mutations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Hirschsprung disease and central hypoventilation syndrome and have been identified in patients with renal agenesis. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.44).
BP6
Variant 10-43124931-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-43124931-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 215914.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=2, Benign=2}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.624 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RETNM_020975.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2988G>A p.Pro996= synonymous_variant 18/20 ENST00000355710.8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RETENST00000355710.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.2988G>A p.Pro996= synonymous_variant 18/205 NM_020975.6 P4P07949-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000131
AC:
33
AN:
251474
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000132
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000615
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000425
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000277
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000967
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000103
AC:
151
AN:
1461870
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000109
AC XY:
79
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000447
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000908
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152222
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74360
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.000172
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000121
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 11, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Apr 28, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 20, 2015This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Appendicitis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedcase-controlKlinik und Poliklinik für Kinderchirurgie, Technische Universität Dresden, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav CarusDec 17, 2020- -
Hirschsprung disease, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Renal hypodysplasia/aplasia 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Pheochromocytoma Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylMar 03, 2017- -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenAug 01, 2023RET: BP4, BP7 -
Multiple endocrine neoplasia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.44
CADD
Benign
0.56
DANN
Benign
0.65

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145798106; hg19: chr10-43620379; API