rs145910245

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000069.3(CACNA1S):​c.4060A>T​(p.Thr1354Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00484 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T1354I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0034 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0050 ( 33 hom. )

Consequence

CACNA1S
NM_000069.3 missense

Scores

5
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.14

Publications

26 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNA1S (HGNC:1397): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 S) This gene encodes one of the five subunits of the slowly inactivating L-type voltage-dependent calcium channel in skeletal muscle cells. Mutations in this gene have been associated with hypokalemic periodic paralysis, thyrotoxic periodic paralysis and malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
CACNA1S Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myopathy 18
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
  • malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics
  • congenital myopathy
    Inheritance: SD, AR, AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Illumina, Genomics England PanelApp
  • hypokalemic periodic paralysis
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009345293).
BP6
Variant 1-201051037-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-201051037-T-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 161208.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00335 (511/152342) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00519 (353/68026). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00474. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 241 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 33 AD,AR,SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
CACNA1SNM_000069.3 linkc.4060A>T p.Thr1354Ser missense_variant Exon 33 of 44 ENST00000362061.4 NP_000060.2 Q13698
CACNA1SXM_005245478.4 linkc.4003A>T p.Thr1335Ser missense_variant Exon 32 of 43 XP_005245535.1 B1ALM3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CACNA1SENST00000362061.4 linkc.4060A>T p.Thr1354Ser missense_variant Exon 33 of 44 1 NM_000069.3 ENSP00000355192.3 Q13698

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00336
AC:
511
AN:
152224
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00367
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00749
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00198
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00519
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00264
AC:
663
AN:
251492
AF XY:
0.00260
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000984
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00506
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00438
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00499
AC:
7295
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.00473
AC XY:
3441
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000836
AC:
28
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00157
AC:
70
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00551
AC:
144
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86258
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
102
AN:
53420
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00598
AC:
6653
AN:
1111990
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00492
AC:
297
AN:
60396
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.461
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
384
768
1151
1535
1919
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
254
508
762
1016
1270
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00335
AC:
511
AN:
152342
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00323
AC XY:
241
AN XY:
74498
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00115
AC:
48
AN:
41586
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00366
AC:
56
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00749
AC:
26
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5188
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4832
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00198
AC:
21
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00519
AC:
353
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00331
AC:
7
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
25
50
75
100
125
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00342
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00322
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00728
AC:
27
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00493
AC:
19
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00512
AC:
44
ExAC
AF:
0.00236
AC:
287
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00540
EpiControl
AF:
0.00480

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Apr 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

CACNA1S: BS2 -

Sep 16, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 32222817, 29193480, 29212769, 27153395, 27181684, 28011884, 20861472, 24784157, 24055113, 25735680, 25637381, 24195946, 26332594, 27147545) -

Oct 19, 2016
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant summary: The CACNA1S c.4060A>T (p.Thr1354Ser) variant involves the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPs&GO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 287/121696 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0037758 (252/66740). This frequency is about 604 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CACNA1S variant (0.0000063), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. The variant was initially considered pathogenic based on a publication showing segregation of the variant in an affected family, absence in 268 control chromosomes, and functional data demonstrating abnormal Ca++ flux (Pirone_2010). Based on this evidence, Lawrence_2013 listed the variant of interest as a reportable incidental finding in exome sequencing cases. However, the high frequency of this variant in the general population puts into question the true pathogenicity of the variant. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as uncertain significance. Taken together, this variant is classified as a VUS until additional evidence becomes available. -

Jan 07, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5 Benign:2
Sep 20, 2022
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 30, 2020
Molecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne Hospital
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change is predicted to replace threonine with serine at codon 1354 of the CACNA1S protein (p.(Thr1354Ser)). The threonine residue is conserved to fish species, which also have a serine residue at codon 1354 (100 vertebrates, UCSC). The variant is located in the extracellular portion of an ion transporter domain. There is a small physicochemical difference between threonine and serine. The variant is present in a large population cohort at a frequency of 0.52% in the European (non-Finnish) population (rs1145910245, gnomAD v3.0). This variant has been reported in a multigenerational family of individuals who were malignant hyperthermia susceptible (PMID: 20861472) and in two unrelated individuals in an Australian cohort, one of which also had a variant in RYR1 (PMID: 25735680). Patch-clamp analyses demonstrate accelerated inward Ca2+ current and increased sensitisation of RYR1 under caffeine exposure in a transfection model. Multiple lines of computational evidence have conflicting predictions for the missense substitution (4/6 algorithms predicting benign/neutral effect, 2/6 algorithms predicting deleterious effect). Based on the classification guidelines RMH Modified ACMG Guidelines v1.3.0, this variant is classified as BENIGN. The following criteria are met: BA1, PP1_Moderate. -

not specified Uncertain:1
Apr 25, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: ExAC: 0.4% (252/66740) Europeans. Classified as VUS in 3 papers (7 total papers in HGMD) -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Uncertain:1
Jun 01, 2014
CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:research

- -

CACNA1S-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 16, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Dec 21, 2024
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 5;C3714580:Hypokalemic periodic paralysis, type 1 Benign:1
Feb 02, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.098
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.068
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.13
CADD
Benign
19
DANN
Benign
0.33
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.28
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.58
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.32
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.70
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.83
T;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.14
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0093
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.25
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
-1.3
.;N
PhyloP100
3.1
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
1.6
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.57
Sift
Benign
1.0
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T
Polyphen
0.090
.;B
Vest4
0.28
MutPred
0.57
.;Gain of disorder (P = 0.086);
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.093
ClinPred
0.034
T
GERP RS
4.4
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.58
Mutation Taster
=93/7
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs145910245; hg19: chr1-201020165; API