rs146072491
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000540.3(RYR1):c.14589C>T(p.Phe4863=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00624 in 1,614,160 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 63 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0059 ( 11 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0063 ( 52 hom. )
Consequence
RYR1
NM_000540.3 synonymous
NM_000540.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 3.42
Genes affected
RYR1 (HGNC:10483): (ryanodine receptor 1) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in skeletal muscle. The encoded protein functions as a calcium release channel in the sarcoplasmic reticulum but also serves to connect the sarcoplasmic reticulum and transverse tubule. Mutations in this gene are associated with malignant hyperthermia susceptibility, central core disease, and minicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia. Alternatively spliced transcripts encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.22).
BP6
Variant 19-38580447-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-38580447-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 159836.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-38580447-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr19-38580447-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=3.42 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0059 (899/152282) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00576 (392/68034). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00529. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 537 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | NM_000540.3 | c.14589C>T | p.Phe4863= | synonymous_variant | 101/106 | ENST00000359596.8 | NP_000531.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RYR1 | ENST00000359596.8 | c.14589C>T | p.Phe4863= | synonymous_variant | 101/106 | 5 | NM_000540.3 | ENSP00000352608 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00591 AC: 899AN: 152162Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
899
AN:
152162
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00609 AC: 1531AN: 251478Hom.: 10 AF XY: 0.00611 AC XY: 831AN XY: 135912
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1531
AN:
251478
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
831
AN XY:
135912
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00628 AC: 9181AN: 1461878Hom.: 52 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00606 AC XY: 4410AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
9181
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
4410
AN XY:
727240
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00590 AC: 899AN: 152282Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00721 AC XY: 537AN XY: 74434
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
899
AN:
152282
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
537
AN XY:
74434
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Sep 27, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jan 16, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 15, 2014 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Aug 17, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Feb 05, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 22, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Apr 29, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jul 01, 2024 | RYR1: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Feb 22, 2018 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Central core myopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
RYR1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Neuromuscular disease, congenital, with uniform type 1 fiber Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Congenital myopathy with fiber type disproportion;C0751951:Central core myopathy;C1840365:King Denborough syndrome;C1850674:Congenital multicore myopathy with external ophthalmoplegia;C2930980:Malignant hyperthermia, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Jul 23, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at