rs146344855
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.2818G>A(p.Val940Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00128 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.2818G>A | p.Val940Met | missense_variant | 13/15 | ENST00000652225.2 | NP_000114.3 | |
BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.4180G>A | p.Val1394Met | missense_variant | 21/23 | NP_001191354.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.2818G>A | p.Val940Met | missense_variant | 13/15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881.2 | |||
BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639435.1 | c.4180G>A | p.Val1394Met | missense_variant | 23/25 | 5 | ENSP00000491742.1 | |||
BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639132.1 | c.3493G>A | p.Val1165Met | missense_variant | 22/24 | 5 | ENSP00000492684.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00110 AC: 167AN: 152128Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000883 AC: 222AN: 251474Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000927 AC XY: 126AN XY: 135912
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00130 AC: 1905AN: 1461892Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00124 AC XY: 900AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00110 AC: 167AN: 152246Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000940 AC XY: 70AN XY: 74448
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden | Nov 03, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Sep 01, 2024 | ERCC5: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 30, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 15, 2022 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center | Nov 08, 2015 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | Sep 21, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 01, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G;C1851443:Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Jul 21, 2023 | Variant summary: ERCC5 c.2818G>A (p.Val940Met) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00088 in 251474 control chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2818G>A in individuals affected with Cerebrooculofacioskeletal Syndrome 3 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as likely benign (n=6) or uncertain significance (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 23, 2021 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | May 10, 2021 | - - |
BIVM-ERCC5-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 01, 2020 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at