rs146344855

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):​c.2818G>A​(p.Val940Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00128 in 1,614,138 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC5
NM_000123.4 missense

Scores

6
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:5B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.92
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC5 (HGNC:3437): (ERCC excision repair 5, endonuclease) This gene encodes a single-strand specific DNA endonuclease that makes the 3' incision in DNA excision repair following UV-induced damage. The protein may also function in other cellular processes, including RNA polymerase II transcription, and transcription-coupled DNA repair. Mutations in this gene cause xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XP-G), which is also referred to as xeroderma pigmentosum VII (XP7), a skin disorder characterized by hypersensitivity to UV light and increased susceptibility for skin cancer development following UV exposure. Some patients also develop Cockayne syndrome, which is characterized by severe growth defects, cognitive disability, and cachexia. Read-through transcription exists between this gene and the neighboring upstream BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]
BIVM-ERCC5 (HGNC:43690): (BIVM-ERCC5 readthrough) This locus represents naturally occurring read-through transcription between the neighboring BIVM (basic, immunoglobulin-like variable motif containing) and ERCC5 (excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 5) genes on chromosome 13. The read-through transcript encodes a fusion protein that shares sequence identity with the products of each individual gene. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2011]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012758315).
BP6
Variant 13-102872337-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-102872337-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 310936.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=4}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
ERCC5NM_000123.4 linkc.2818G>A p.Val940Met missense_variant Exon 13 of 15 ENST00000652225.2 NP_000114.3 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5NM_001204425.2 linkc.4180G>A p.Val1394Met missense_variant Exon 21 of 23 NP_001191354.2 R4GMW8Q59FZ7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ERCC5ENST00000652225.2 linkc.2818G>A p.Val940Met missense_variant Exon 13 of 15 NM_000123.4 ENSP00000498881.2 P28715-1
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639435.1 linkc.4180G>A p.Val1394Met missense_variant Exon 23 of 25 5 ENSP00000491742.1 R4GMW8
BIVM-ERCC5ENST00000639132.1 linkc.3493G>A p.Val1165Met missense_variant Exon 22 of 24 5 ENSP00000492684.1 A0A1W2PS85

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00110
AC:
167
AN:
152128
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00287
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000883
AC:
222
AN:
251474
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000927
AC XY:
126
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000173
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00506
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000924
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00122
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000978
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00130
AC:
1905
AN:
1461892
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00124
AC XY:
900
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000224
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00543
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00118
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00110
AC:
167
AN:
152246
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000940
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
74448
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00404
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00284
Alfa
AF:
0.00161
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00119
TwinsUK
AF:
0.000539
AC:
2
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00156
AC:
6
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000908
AC:
4
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00140
AC:
12
ExAC
AF:
0.000824
AC:
100
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00174
EpiControl
AF:
0.00219

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:5Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:3
Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

ERCC5: BP4, BS2 -

Nov 03, 2021
Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 28, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 15, 2022
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G Uncertain:2Benign:1
Sep 21, 2015
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 08, 2015
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 01, 2017
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group G;C1851443:Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 3 Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Uncertain:1
Jul 21, 2023
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: ERCC5 c.2818G>A (p.Val940Met) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00088 in 251474 control chromosomes, including 1 homozygote, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0012 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.2818G>A in individuals affected with Cerebrooculofacioskeletal Syndrome 3 and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Ten submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as likely benign (n=6) or uncertain significance (n=4). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly benign. -

Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Aug 23, 2021
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

BIVM-ERCC5-related disorder Benign:1
Apr 01, 2020
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
May 10, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.13
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.36
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.29
CADD
Uncertain
24
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
.;.;.;T;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.55
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.52
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.88
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D;.;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.043
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.013
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.21
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
2.0
.;.;.;M;.
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
.;.;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.19
Sift
Benign
0.035
.;.;.;D;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.070
.;.;.;T;T
Polyphen
1.0
.;.;.;D;.
Vest4
0.37, 0.39
MVP
0.71
MPC
0.54
ClinPred
0.037
T
GERP RS
5.5
Varity_R
0.25
gMVP
0.55

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146344855; hg19: chr13-103524687; COSMIC: COSV99053839; COSMIC: COSV99053839; API