rs146430937
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8010G>A(p.Ser2670=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000508 in 1,613,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -1.17
Genes affected
BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).
BP6
Variant 13-32363212-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32363212-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183837.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32363212-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.17 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.8010G>A | p.Ser2670= | synonymous_variant | 18/27 | ENST00000380152.8 | NP_000050.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.8010G>A | p.Ser2670= | synonymous_variant | 18/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | ENSP00000369497 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000395 AC: 6AN: 152018Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
6
AN:
152018
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000718 AC: 18AN: 250788Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000516 AC XY: 7AN XY: 135548
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
18
AN:
250788
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135548
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000513 AC: 75AN: 1461506Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000564 AC XY: 41AN XY: 727048
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
75
AN:
1461506
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
41
AN XY:
727048
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152136Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74370
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
152136
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74370
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | May 22, 2017 | Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.8010G>A (p.Ser2670Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 11/120304 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000914, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503). The variant has been reported in the literature, without strong evidence for causality. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign, with one database citing the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant in one individual (BRCA1 c.3228_3229delAG (p.Gly1077AlafsX8)). Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Dec 27, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The BRCA2 p.Ser2670= variant was identified in 2 of 324 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Muendlein 2015, Zanella 2017). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146430937) as "With other allele”, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Color; as likely benign by 4 submitters; as uncertain significance by Counsyl), COGR, Cosmic (1x in large intestine tissue), and in UMD-LSDB (12x as neutral), databases. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3228_3229delAG, p.Gly1077AlafsX8), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ser2670= variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was not identified in BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 16 of 245594 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European in 14 of 111296 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30750 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity study shows the variant may disrupt the helical-OB1 interface (Guidugli 2013). The p.Ser2670= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Nov 06, 2021 | - - |
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Apr 05, 2017 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Feb 19, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Nov 04, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 06, 2016 | - - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Apr 19, 2022 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C. | Sep 15, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 28, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital | Aug 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 29, 2015 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research | Mar 06, 2014 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 24, 2023 | - - |
BRCA2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 07, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at