rs146430937

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.8010G>A(p.Ser2670Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000508 in 1,613,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000051 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

BRCA2
NM_000059.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:1B:21

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.17

Variant links:

Genes affected

BRCA2 (HGNC:1101): (BRCA2 DNA repair associated) Inherited mutations in BRCA1 and this gene, BRCA2, confer increased lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer. Both BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in maintenance of genome stability, specifically the homologous recombination pathway for double-strand DNA repair. The largest exon in both genes is exon 11, which harbors the most important and frequent mutations in breast cancer patients. The BRCA2 gene was found on chromosome 13q12.3 in human. The BRCA2 protein contains several copies of a 70 aa motif called the BRC motif, and these motifs mediate binding to the RAD51 recombinase which functions in DNA repair. BRCA2 is considered a tumor suppressor gene, as tumors with BRCA2 mutations generally exhibit loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the wild-type allele. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

BRCA2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.42).

BP6

Variant 13-32363212-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr13-32363212-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 183837.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr13-32363212-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.17 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	NM_000059.4 link	c.8010G>A	p.Ser2670Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 27	ENST00000380152.8	NP_000050.3	P51587

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BRCA2	ENST00000380152.8 link	c.8010G>A	p.Ser2670Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 27	5	NM_000059.4	ENSP00000369497.3	P51587
BRCA2	ENST00000530893.7 link	c.7641G>A	p.Ser2547Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 18 of 27	1		ENSP00000499438.2	A0A590UJI7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259.2 link	n.*68G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 17 of 26	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7
BRCA2	ENST00000614259 link	n.*68G>A		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 17 of 25	2		ENSP00000506251.1	A0A7P0TAP7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000395

AC:

AN:

152018

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000656

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000718

AC:

AN:

250788

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000516

AC XY:

AN XY:

135548

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000289

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000513

AC:

AN:

1461506

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000564

AC XY:

AN XY:

727048

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000597

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000348

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000540

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000132

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000460

AC:

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000403

AC XY:

AN XY:

74370

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000735

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000975

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000416

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000178

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:21

Revision: reviewed by expert panel

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:7

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 22, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The BRCA2 c.8010G>A (p.Ser2670Ser) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a damaging outcome for this variant. 4/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 11/120304 control chromosomes at a frequency of 0.0000914, which does not exceed the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BRCA2 variant (0.0007503). The variant has been reported in the literature, without strong evidence for causality. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign/benign, with one database citing the variant to co-occur with a pathogenic BRCA1 variant in one individual (BRCA1 c.3228_3229delAG (p.Gly1077AlafsX8)). Taken together, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 27, 2022

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BRCA2: BP4, BP7 -

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

The BRCA2 p.Ser2670= variant was identified in 2 of 324 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.006) from individuals or families with breast or ovarian cancer (Muendlein 2015, Zanella 2017). The variant was also identified in dbSNP (ID: rs146430937) as "With other alleleâ€šÃ„Ã¹, ClinVar (classified as benign by Invitae, GeneDx and Color; as likely benign by 4 submitters; as uncertain significance by Counsyl), COGR, Cosmic (1x in large intestine tissue), and in UMD-LSDB (12x as neutral), databases. In UMD the variant was identified with a co-occurring pathogenic BRCA1 variant (c.3228_3229delAG, p.Gly1077AlafsX8), increasing the likelihood that the p.Ser2670= variant does not have clinical significance. The variant was not identified in BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, or Zhejiang University databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 16 of 245594 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.00007 (Genome Aggregation Database Feb 27, 2017). The variant was observed in the following populations: European in 14 of 111296 chromosomes (freq: 0.0001), and South Asian in 2 of 30750 chromosomes (freq: 0.00007), while the variant was not observed in the African, Other, Latino, Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian, or Finnish populations. A classification model for BRCA2 DNA binding domain missense variants based on homology-directed repair activity study shows the variant may disrupt the helical-OB1 interface (Guidugli 2013). The p.Ser2670= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Nov 06, 2021

Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:4

Nov 04, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 02, 2024

Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

BS1_Supporting, BP4, BP7 c.8010G>A, located in a (potentially) clinically important functional domain of BRCA2, is predicted to result in no splicing alteration (according to SpliceAI) and no amino acid change, p.(Ser2670=) (BP4, BP7). The variant allele was found in 14/117809 alleles, with a filter allele frequency of 0,006% at 99% confidence, within the European (non-Finnish) population in the gnomAD v2.1.1 database (non-cancer data set) (BS1_Supporting). To our knowledge, neither relevant clinical data nor well-stablished functional studies have been reported for this variant. In addition, the variant was also identified in the following databases: BRCA Exchange (Likely benign: Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/)), ClinVar (3x benign, 15x likely benign, 1x uncertain significance) and LOVD (1x benign, 5x likely benign, 10x uncertain significance). Based on currently available information, the variant c.8010G>A should be considered a likely benign variant. -

Feb 19, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

Mar 06, 2016

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 05, 2017

Counsyl

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 29, 2017

Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: reviewed by expert panel

Collection Method: curation

Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). -

Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome

Benign:3

Sep 15, 2021

Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 19, 2022

National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 29, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Breast and/or ovarian cancer

Benign:2

Mar 06, 2014

Foulkes Cancer Genetics LDI, Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2023

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

BRCA2-related disorder

Benign:1

Feb 07, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.42

CADD

Benign

0.67

DANN

Benign

0.72

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over