rs146605798
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1
The NM_002485.5(NBN):c.1035C>T(p.Gly345Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000136 in 1,613,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
NBN
NM_002485.5 synonymous
NM_002485.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.12
Genes affected
NBN (HGNC:7652): (nibrin) Mutations in this gene are associated with Nijmegen breakage syndrome, an autosomal recessive chromosomal instability syndrome characterized by microcephaly, growth retardation, immunodeficiency, and cancer predisposition. The encoded protein is a member of the MRE11/RAD50 double-strand break repair complex which consists of 5 proteins. This gene product is thought to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and DNA damage-induced checkpoint activation. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 8-89958814-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-89958814-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 127853.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=6, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2}. Variant chr8-89958814-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.12 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000151 (23/152276) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00386 (20/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00255. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | NM_002485.5 | c.1035C>T | p.Gly345Gly | synonymous_variant | 9/16 | ENST00000265433.8 | NP_002476.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBN | ENST00000265433.8 | c.1035C>T | p.Gly345Gly | synonymous_variant | 9/16 | 1 | NM_002485.5 | ENSP00000265433.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152158Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152158
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000430 AC: 108AN: 251366Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000339 AC XY: 46AN XY: 135850
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
108
AN:
251366
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
46
AN XY:
135850
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000135 AC: 197AN: 1461488Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000118 AC XY: 86AN XY: 727066
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
197
AN:
1461488
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
86
AN XY:
727066
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152276Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74460
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
23
AN:
152276
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
10
AN XY:
74460
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
3
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:4
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System | - | The NBN p.Gly345Gly variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in the Cosmic, LOVD 3.0, Zhejiang Colon Cancer databases. The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs146605798) as “With Likely benign, Uncertain significance allele”, ClinVar (3x, as Benign by Invitae, likely benign by Amby Genetics and uncertain significance by GeneDx), Clinvitae (3x). The variant was identified in control databases in 109 of 277086 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000393 in the following populations: “other” in 1 of 6466 chromosomes (freq. 0.00015), European in 1 of 126612 chromosomes (freq. 0.000008), East Asian in 104 of 18868 chromosomes (freq. 0.0055), Finnish in 3 of 25794 chromosomes (freq. 0.000116) (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Gly345Gly variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid. The variant occurs outside of the splicing consensus sequence and 3 of 5 in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) predict a greater than 10% difference in splicing. However, this information is not predictive enough to assume pathogenicity. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as uncertain significance. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Apr 28, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25980754) - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Mar 01, 2023 | NBN: BP4, BP7 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 16, 2016 | Variant summary: The NBN c.1035C>T (p.Gly345Gly) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide, resulting in a synonymous change. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. multiple in silico models predict the formation of a cryptic donor site with a higher score than the canonocal splice donor site, however, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. This variant was found in 59/121358 control chromosomes, predominantly observed in the East Asian subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0067021 (58/8654). This frequency is about 54 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic NBN variant (0.000125), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of East Asian origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign/likely benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano | Jun 20, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 17, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | True Health Diagnostics | Aug 22, 2017 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Nov 01, 2021 | - - |
Microcephaly, normal intelligence and immunodeficiency Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Aug 27, 2019 | - - |
NBN-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Sep 13, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at