rs146772848
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 3P and 9B. PM2PP2BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_006420.3(ARFGEF2):c.1888G>A(p.Val630Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000236 in 1,613,934 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006420.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARFGEF2 | NM_006420.3 | c.1888G>A | p.Val630Ile | missense_variant | 14/39 | ENST00000371917.5 | |
ARFGEF2 | NM_001410846.1 | c.1885G>A | p.Val629Ile | missense_variant | 14/39 | ||
ARFGEF2 | XM_047439832.1 | c.1324G>A | p.Val442Ile | missense_variant | 12/37 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARFGEF2 | ENST00000371917.5 | c.1888G>A | p.Val630Ile | missense_variant | 14/39 | 1 | NM_006420.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000999 AC: 152AN: 152146Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000286 AC: 72AN: 251446Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000235 AC XY: 32AN XY: 135910
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000157 AC: 229AN: 1461670Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000142 AC XY: 103AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000998 AC: 152AN: 152264Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00105 AC XY: 78AN XY: 74452
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Oct 11, 2023 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | May 04, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Sep 04, 2020 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Nov 15, 2016 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jul 03, 2014 | - - |
Periventricular heterotopia with microcephaly, autosomal recessive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
ARFGEF2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 23, 2022 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at