Menu
GeneBe

rs146849637

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):​c.829G>A​(p.Val277Ile) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00335 in 1,613,522 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V277A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0020 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0035 ( 17 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 missense, splice_region

Scores

7
11

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:1B:16

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.07
Variant links:
Genes affected
FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant where missense usually causes diseases, FBN2
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.023231387).
BP6
Variant 5-128446604-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128446604-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 213259.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-128446604-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr5-128446604-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00202 (307/152316) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00356 (242/68016). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00319. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 139 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 307 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FBN2NM_001999.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.829G>A p.Val277Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 7/65 ENST00000262464.9
FBN2XM_017009228.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.829G>A p.Val277Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 7/64

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FBN2ENST00000262464.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.829G>A p.Val277Ile missense_variant, splice_region_variant 7/651 NM_001999.4 P1P35556-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00202
AC:
307
AN:
152198
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000627
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00356
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000956
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00168
AC:
423
AN:
251430
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00166
AC XY:
226
AN XY:
135888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000520
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00309
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000815
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00349
AC:
5095
AN:
1461206
Hom.:
17
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00336
AC XY:
2440
AN XY:
726918
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000115
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00141
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00430
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00297
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00202
AC:
307
AN:
152316
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00187
AC XY:
139
AN XY:
74486
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000625
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00356
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000946
Alfa
AF:
0.00293
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00190
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00351
AC:
13
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00519
AC:
20
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00113
AC:
5
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00384
AC:
33
ExAC
AF:
0.00181
AC:
220
EpiCase
AF:
0.00294
EpiControl
AF:
0.00302

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:16
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxNov 10, 2022See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJul 01, 2024FBN2: BS1 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesMay 28, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJun 13, 2017- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Congenital contractural arachnodactyly Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics, Royal Melbourne HospitalApr 07, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMendelicsMay 28, 2019- -
not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 15, 2016- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJul 30, 2023- -
Loeys-Dietz syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins All Children's HospitalMar 30, 2017- -
FBN2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesAug 04, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 11, 2018This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenJun 14, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.11
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.26
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
CADD
Benign
23
DANN
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.23
T;.;T;T;.
Eigen
Benign
0.086
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;.;.;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.17
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.023
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.088
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
-0.77
N;.;N;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.67
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.47
N;.;N;N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.43
Sift
Benign
0.68
T;.;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.99
D;.;D;D;B
Vest4
0.27
MVP
0.72
MPC
0.28
ClinPred
0.040
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.071
gMVP
0.14

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146849637; hg19: chr5-127782297; API