rs146902870

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):c.3372C>T(p.Ser1124Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 654,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 10 hom., cov: 29)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.252

Variant links:

Genes affected

RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

RPGRIP1L links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).

BP6

Variant 16-53622279-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53622279-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 167607.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-53622279-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.252 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00641 (969/151240) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.022 (905/41142). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0208. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 456 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	NM_015272.5 link	c.3372C>T	p.Ser1124Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 27	ENST00000647211.2	NP_056087.2	Q68CZ1-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RPGRIP1L	ENST00000647211.2 link	c.3372C>T	p.Ser1124Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 23 of 27		NM_015272.5	ENSP00000493946.1		Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00640

AC:

967

AN:

151124

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0220

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00330

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000417

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000590

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00385

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00147

AC:

158

AN:

107416

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00127

AC XY:

AN XY:

59092

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0237

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00148

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000160

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000765

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000613

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000862

AC:

434

AN:

503644

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000779

AC XY:

210

AN XY:

269668

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0200

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00156

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000281

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00234

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00641

AC:

969

AN:

151240

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00618

AC XY:

456

AN XY:

73806

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0220

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00330

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000418

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000590

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00381

Alfa

AF:

0.00368

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00788

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Meckel syndrome, type 5

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis

Benign:1

Jan 25, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Kidney disorder

Benign:1

Dec 12, 2016

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joubert syndrome 7

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Nephronophthisis 8

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.91

CADD

Benign

5.1

DANN

Benign

0.36

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over