rs146902870

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):​c.3372C>T​(p.Ser1124=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00214 in 654,884 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0064 ( 10 hom., cov: 29)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00086 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.252
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.91).
BP6
Variant 16-53622279-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53622279-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 167607.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr16-53622279-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.252 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00641 (969/151240) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.022 (905/41142). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0208. There are 10 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 456 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 29. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.3372C>T p.Ser1124= synonymous_variant 23/27 ENST00000647211.2 NP_056087.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.3372C>T p.Ser1124= synonymous_variant 23/27 NM_015272.5 ENSP00000493946 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00640
AC:
967
AN:
151124
Hom.:
11
Cov.:
29
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000417
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000590
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00385
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00147
AC:
158
AN:
107416
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00127
AC XY:
75
AN XY:
59092
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0237
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00148
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000160
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000765
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000613
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000862
AC:
434
AN:
503644
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.000779
AC XY:
210
AN XY:
269668
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0200
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00156
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000281
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00234
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00641
AC:
969
AN:
151240
Hom.:
10
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00618
AC XY:
456
AN XY:
73806
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0220
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00330
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000590
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00381
Alfa
AF:
0.00368
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00788

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Nov 01, 2016- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 01, 2019- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Joubert syndrome 7 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Kidney disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenDec 12, 2016- -
Nephronophthisis 8 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.91
CADD
Benign
5.1
DANN
Benign
0.36

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs146902870; hg19: chr16-53656191; API