rs146917406
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001101362.3(KBTBD13):c.794G>A(p.Gly265Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0121 in 1,582,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 169 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0091 ( 11 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.012 ( 158 hom. )
Consequence
KBTBD13
NM_001101362.3 missense
NM_001101362.3 missense
Scores
13
2
3
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 9.72
Genes affected
KBTBD13 (HGNC:37227): (kelch repeat and BTB domain containing 13) The gene belongs to a family of genes encoding proteins containing a BTB domain and several kelch repeats. The BTB domain functions as a protein-protein interaction module, which includes an ability to self-associate or to interact with non-BTB domain-containing proteins. The kelch motif typically occurs in groups of five to seven repeats, and has been found in proteins with diverse functions. Known functions of these family members include transcription regulation, ion channel tetramerization and gating, protein ubiquitination or degradation, and cytoskeleton regulation. The exact function of this family member has yet to be determined. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 9: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when BayesDel_addAF, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015187234).
BP6
Variant 15-65077609-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-65077609-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 129310.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr15-65077609-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00909 (1384/152288) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0139 (943/67998). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0131. There are 11 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 713 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1384 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBTBD13 | NM_001101362.3 | c.794G>A | p.Gly265Asp | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000432196.5 | NP_001094832.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBTBD13 | ENST00000432196.5 | c.794G>A | p.Gly265Asp | missense_variant | 1/1 | NM_001101362.3 | ENSP00000388723 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00910 AC: 1384AN: 152170Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1384
AN:
152170
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00820 AC: 1582AN: 192922Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00807 AC XY: 870AN XY: 107828
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1582
AN:
192922
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
870
AN XY:
107828
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0125 AC: 17810AN: 1429718Hom.: 158 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.0121 AC XY: 8602AN XY: 710168
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
17810
AN:
1429718
Hom.:
Cov.:
44
AF XY:
AC XY:
8602
AN XY:
710168
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00909 AC: 1384AN: 152288Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00957 AC XY: 713AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1384
AN:
152288
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
713
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
19
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
48
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
7
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
101
ExAC
AF:
AC:
1021
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
2
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 11, 2021 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 05, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Nemaline myopathy 6 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | May 03, 2022 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | KBTBD13: PP3, BS1, BS2 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
CADD
Pathogenic
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
D
Eigen
Pathogenic
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
D
MetaRNN
Benign
T
MetaSVM
Pathogenic
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
H
MutationTaster
Benign
D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
Sift
Pathogenic
D
Sift4G
Pathogenic
D
Polyphen
D
Vest4
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at