rs147000526

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP3BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_004415.4(DSP):c.6881C>G(p.Ala2294Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000794 in 1,614,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00061 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00081 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

DSP
NM_004415.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.91

Variant links:

Genes affected

DSP (HGNC:3052): (desmoplakin) This gene encodes a protein that anchors intermediate filaments to desmosomal plaques and forms an obligate component of functional desmosomes. Mutations in this gene are the cause of several cardiomyopathies and keratodermas, including skin fragility-woolly hair syndrome. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]

DSP links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 7: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.1640684).

BP6

Variant 6-7584143-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-7584143-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 44943.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=12, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr6-7584143-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000611 (93/152270) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00183 (28/15304). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0013. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 48 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSP	NM_004415.4 link	c.6881C>G	p.Ala2294Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	ENST00000379802.8	NP_004406.2	P15924-1B4DKX6
DSP	NM_001319034.2 link	c.5552C>G	p.Ala1851Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24		NP_001305963.1	P15924-3B4DKX6
DSP	NM_001008844.3 link	c.5084C>G	p.Ala1695Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24		NP_001008844.1	P15924-2B4DKX6Q4LE79

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DSP	ENST00000379802.8 link	c.6881C>G	p.Ala2294Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	1	NM_004415.4	ENSP00000369129.3	P15924-1
DSP	ENST00000418664.2 link	c.5084C>G	p.Ala1695Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24	1		ENSP00000396591.2	P15924-2
DSP	ENST00000710359.1 link	c.5552C>G	p.Ala1851Gly	missense_variant	Exon 24 of 24			ENSP00000518230.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000611

AC:

AN:

152152

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000676

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000843

AC:

212

AN:

251492

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000743

AC XY:

101

AN XY:

135920

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00208

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000229

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000949

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00244

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000813

AC:

1189

AN:

1461882

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000765

AC XY:

556

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000300

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000892

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000944

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000611

AC:

AN:

152270

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000645

AC XY:

AN XY:

74452

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000241

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00183

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000415

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000377

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000676

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.000584

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000876

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000778

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000848

AC:

103

EpiCase

AF:

0.000709

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:6

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2019

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 25, 2021

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25637381, 25820315, 26314686, 27153395, 23299917, 25616645, 26498160, 23861362, 25163546, 25351510, 26899768, 27896284, 21859740, 26220970) -

not specified

Uncertain:2Benign:1

Jan 10, 2017

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

proposed classification - variant undergoing re-assessment, contact laboratory -

Feb 17, 2025

Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2013

Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Stanford University

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

Note this variant was found in clinical genetic testing performed by one or more labs who may also submit to ClinVar. Thus any internal case data may overlap with the internal case data of other labs. The interpretation reviewed below is that of the Stanford Center for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease. Given the lack of segregation in multiple cases we consider this variant a variant of uncertain significance, probably benign. The variant has been seen in at least 2 unrelated cases of DCM and 4 cases ARVC with failure to segregate in at least 4 cases. At least 7% of patients with autosomal dominant ARVC have been reported to have a mutation in the DSP gene (McNally E et al., 2009). The Ala2294Gly variant has been reported previously in two individuals with dilated cardiomyoapthy (Garcia-Pavia P et al., 2011). One of the probands was a 60 year old male, the other a 51 year old male. No segregation analysis was available. This was a cohort of 95 patients randomly selected from a cohort of 187 patients transplanted for DCM between 1993 and 2007. The authors did sequencing for plakophillin-2 (PKP2), desmoplakin (DSP), desmocollin-2 (DSC2), desmoglein (DSG2) and plakoglobin (JUP). They did not study other DCM genes. Garcia and Monserrat (2010, case presentation) reported this variant was identified in a proband with right ventricular dysfunction, whose father was also affected, but did not carry the variant. The proband carried three other variants in the tested ARVC genes. As part of the authors' review of this variant, they report this variant has been reported in an additional three families (Dr. Van der Zwaag, personal communication). In one of these families, a proband with ARVC had solely this variant and it failed to segregate with disease in the proband's mother who also had a clinical diagnosis of ARVC. Another family, the proband (72 years old) carried a second confirmed pathogenic mutation in DSP. In the third family, the variant was identified in the father of a male patient who died suddenly at age 25, although the patient did not have the variant and both were carrier of a confirmed pathogenic mutation in another gene. In silico analysis with PolyPhen-2 predicts the variant to be probably damaging. The alanine at codon 2294 is conserved across species, as are neighboring amino acids. In total the variant has been seen in 3/6703 laboratory controls, published controls and individuals from publicly available population datasets. The variant was reported online in 3 of 4300 Caucasian individuals and 0 of 2203 African-American individuals in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project dataset (as of 1/30/14). The phenotype of those individuals is not publicly available. The dataset is comprised of multiple cohorts, some of which were recruited from the general population, others were enriched for common cardiovascular disease. This variant is listed in dbSNP: rs147000526. The variant was not observed in the following laboratory and published control samples: Not present in 200 control individuals (Garcia-Pavia P e al., 2011) -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:3

Sep 28, 2021

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 24, 2019

Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 18, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma

Benign:1

Sep 23, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8;C1854063:Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy with wooly hair and keratoderma

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Benign:1

Dec 01, 2015

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Lethal acantholytic epidermolysis bullosa

Benign:1

May 16, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Woolly hair-skin fragility syndrome

Benign:1

May 16, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 8

Benign:1

May 16, 2019

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Jan 17, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.88

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.088

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.35

CADD

Pathogenic

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.49

T;.

Eigen

Pathogenic

1.0

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.97

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

LIST_S2

Pathogenic

0.98

D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.18

MetaRNN

Benign

0.16

T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.57

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.5

H;.

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.74

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-3.5

D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.72

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Polyphen

0.99

D;.

Vest4

0.71

MVP

0.94

MPC

0.79

ClinPred

0.32

GERP RS

6.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Varity_R

0.88

gMVP

0.78

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over