Menu
GeneBe

rs147091980

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000218.3(KCNQ1):c.1800G>A(p.Thr600=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00067 in 1,573,608 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00070 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

KCNQ1
NM_000218.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.42
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNQ1 (HGNC:6294): (potassium voltage-gated channel subfamily Q member 1) This gene encodes a voltage-gated potassium channel required for repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential. This protein can form heteromultimers with two other potassium channel proteins, KCNE1 and KCNE3. Mutations in this gene are associated with hereditary long QT syndrome 1 (also known as Romano-Ward syndrome), Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome, and familial atrial fibrillation. This gene exhibits tissue-specific imprinting, with preferential expression from the maternal allele in some tissues, and biallelic expression in others. This gene is located in a region of chromosome 11 amongst other imprinted genes that are associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), and itself has been shown to be disrupted by chromosomal rearrangements in patients with BWS. Alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2011]
KCNQ1-AS1 (HGNC:42790): (KCNQ1 antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.77).
BP6
Variant 11-2847772-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-2847772-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 163744.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=5, Benign=4}. Variant chr11-2847772-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr11-2847772-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.42 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
KCNQ1NM_000218.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1800G>A p.Thr600= synonymous_variant 16/16 ENST00000155840.12
KCNQ1-AS1NR_130721.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.778-7330C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
KCNQ1ENST00000155840.12 linkuse as main transcriptc.1800G>A p.Thr600= synonymous_variant 16/161 NM_000218.3 P1P51787-1
KCNQ1-AS1ENST00000440887.2 linkuse as main transcriptn.777-7330C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 5

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000375
AC:
57
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000275
AC:
51
AN:
185222
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000231
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
99688
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000897
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000177
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000708
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000563
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000200
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000701
AC:
997
AN:
1421300
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000694
AC XY:
488
AN XY:
703312
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000917
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000280
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000851
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000404
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000730
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000374
AC:
57
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000336
AC XY:
25
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000327
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000409
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000412
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 18, 2020- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingJoint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+-- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 03, 2015- -
not specified Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineApr 30, 2012Thr600Thr in Exon 16 of KCNQ1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.1% (6/6988) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs147091980). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpFeb 28, 2021- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Long QT syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Long QT syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Atrial fibrillation, familial, 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Short QT syndrome type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 15, 2016This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Cardiac arrhythmia Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 28, 2018- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.77
Cadd
Benign
0.16
Dann
Benign
0.89

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147091980; hg19: chr11-2869002; API