rs147102633

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_001999.4(FBN2):c.7380C>T(p.Cys2460Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000837 in 1,613,878 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00047 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00088 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

FBN2
NM_001999.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0750

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

FBN2 (HGNC:3604): (fibrillin 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of connective tissue microfibrils and may be involved in elastic fiber assembly. Mutations in this gene cause congenital contractural arachnodactyly. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

FBN2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

congenital contractural arachnodactyly
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
carpal tunnel syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Franklin by Genoox
familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
macular degeneration, early-onset
Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

FBN2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.49).

BP6

Variant 5-128277971-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-128277971-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 137349.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.075 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000473 (72/152256) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.00124 (6/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000542. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 37 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 72 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FBN2	NM_001999.4 link	c.7380C>T	p.Cys2460Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 58 of 65	ENST00000262464.9	NP_001990.2	P35556-1
FBN2	XM_017009228.3 link	c.7227C>T	p.Cys2409Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 57 of 64		XP_016864717.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FBN2	ENST00000262464.9 link	c.7380C>T	p.Cys2460Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 58 of 65	1	NM_001999.4	ENSP00000262464.4		P35556-1
FBN2	ENST00000703783.1 link	n.4164C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 33 of 38

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152138

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000393

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00104

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000632

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000868

AC:

218

AN:

251208

AF XY:

0.000936

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000868

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000693

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00124

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000979

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000875

AC:

1279

AN:

1461622

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000902

AC XY:

656

AN XY:

727132

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000149

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26132

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000252

AC:

AN:

39680

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00211

AC:

182

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00103

AC:

AN:

53418

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000880

AC:

978

AN:

1111788

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000878

AC:

AN:

60380

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

128

193

257

321

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

120

160

200

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152256

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000497

AC XY:

AN XY:

74446

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000144

AC:

AN:

41530

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000393

AC:

AN:

15286

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00124

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000632

AC:

AN:

68028

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000573

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000382

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000491

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:11

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Sep 01, 2016

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 27, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 01, 2022

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

FBN2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Congenital contractural arachnodactyly

Benign:4

Jun 23, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 24, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jan 21, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:2

Mar 29, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jul 21, 2023

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Aug 26, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2021

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.49

CADD

Benign

7.1

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.65

PhyloP100

0.075

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over