rs147189224
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_006031.6(PCNT):āc.6080A>Gā(p.Gln2027Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00255 in 1,612,562 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 11 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006031.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | NM_006031.6 | c.6080A>G | p.Gln2027Arg | missense_variant | 29/47 | ENST00000359568.10 | NP_006022.3 | |
PCNT | NM_001315529.2 | c.5726A>G | p.Gln1909Arg | missense_variant | 29/47 | NP_001302458.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCNT | ENST00000359568.10 | c.6080A>G | p.Gln2027Arg | missense_variant | 29/47 | 1 | NM_006031.6 | ENSP00000352572.5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00152 AC: 232AN: 152238Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00177 AC: 443AN: 249886Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00185 AC XY: 250AN XY: 135160
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00265 AC: 3876AN: 1460206Hom.: 11 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00260 AC XY: 1887AN XY: 726450
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00152 AC: 232AN: 152356Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00127 AC XY: 95AN XY: 74514
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Nov 01, 2024 | PCNT: BP4 - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 11, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 21, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Oct 10, 2019 | - - |
PCNT-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 12, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at