Menu
GeneBe

rs147206089

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001887.4(CRYBB1):c.328C>T(p.Arg110Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00366 in 1,614,210 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 34 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0025 ( 2 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0038 ( 32 hom. )

Consequence

CRYBB1
NM_001887.4 missense

Scores

1
12

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
CRYBB1 (HGNC:2397): (crystallin beta B1) Crystallins are separated into two classes: taxon-specific, or enzyme, and ubiquitous. The latter class constitutes the major proteins of vertebrate eye lens and maintains the transparency and refractive index of the lens. Since lens central fiber cells lose their nuclei during development, these crystallins are made and then retained throughout life, making them extremely stable proteins. Mammalian lens crystallins are divided into alpha, beta, and gamma families; beta and gamma crystallins are also considered as a superfamily. Alpha and beta families are further divided into acidic and basic groups. Seven protein regions exist in crystallins: four homologous motifs, a connecting peptide, and N- and C-terminal extensions. Beta-crystallins, the most heterogeneous, differ by the presence of the C-terminal extension (present in the basic group, none in the acidic group). Beta-crystallins form aggregates of different sizes and are able to self-associate to form dimers or to form heterodimers with other beta-crystallins. This gene, a beta basic group member, undergoes extensive cleavage at its N-terminal extension during lens maturation. It is also a member of a gene cluster with beta-A4, beta-B2, and beta-B3. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.01889366).
BP6
Variant 22-26607993-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-26607993-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 468742.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr22-26607993-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr22-26607993-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00247 (376/152346) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00807 (39/4834). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00607. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 181 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 SD gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CRYBB1NM_001887.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.328C>T p.Arg110Cys missense_variant 4/6 ENST00000647684.1
CRYBB1XM_011529899.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.328C>T p.Arg110Cys missense_variant 4/6
CRYBA4XM_006724140.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.-67G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 3/8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CRYBB1ENST00000647684.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.328C>T p.Arg110Cys missense_variant 4/6 NM_001887.4 P1
ENST00000668614.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.228G>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/3
CRYBB1ENST00000647569.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.140C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 2/3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00244
AC:
372
AN:
152228
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00744
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00379
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00239
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00382
AC:
961
AN:
251424
Hom.:
9
AF XY:
0.00467
AC XY:
635
AN XY:
135898
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000431
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00942
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00456
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00378
AC:
5531
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00419
AC XY:
3050
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00127
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00742
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0125
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000281
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00347
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00376
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00247
AC:
376
AN:
152346
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00243
AC XY:
181
AN XY:
74502
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000481
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00835
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00807
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000188
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00381
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00237
Alfa
AF:
0.00357
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00241
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00431
AC:
16
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00389
AC:
15
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00453
AC:
39
ExAC
AF:
0.00396
AC:
481
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00491
AC:
17
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 17 multiple types Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to rule this variant out of causing disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeOct 24, 2023- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenDec 01, 2022CRYBB1: BP4, BS1, BS2; ENSG00000286326: BS1, BS2 -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.31
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.21
Cadd
Uncertain
23
Dann
Benign
0.95
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.30
T;T
Eigen
Benign
-0.24
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.14
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.91
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.019
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.74
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.43
T
Polyphen
0.11
B;B
Vest4
0.56
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
0.0095
T
GERP RS
2.5
Varity_R
0.23
gMVP
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147206089; hg19: chr22-27003957; API