rs147584015

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_000258.3(MYL3):c.81T>C(p.Pro27Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000289 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYL3
NM_000258.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.93

Variant links:

Genes affected

MYL3 (HGNC:7584): (myosin light chain 3) MYL3 encodes myosin light chain 3, an alkali light chain also referred to in the literature as both the ventricular isoform and the slow skeletal muscle isoform. Mutations in MYL3 have been identified as a cause of mid-left ventricular chamber type hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

MYL3 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).

BP6

Variant 3-46863310-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-46863310-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43130.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=7, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr3-46863310-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr3-46863310-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.93 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
MYL3	NM_000258.3 link	c.81T>C	p.Pro27Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 7	ENST00000292327.6	NP_000249.1	P08590A0A024R2Q5
MYL3	NM_001406937.1 link	c.81T>C	p.Pro27Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 6		NP_001393866.1
MYL3	NM_001406938.1 link	c.81T>C	p.Pro27Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 9		NP_001393867.1
MYL3	NM_001406939.1 link	c.81T>C	p.Pro27Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 3 of 9		NP_001393868.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
MYL3	ENST00000292327.6 link	c.81T>C	p.Pro27Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 1 of 7	1	NM_000258.3	ENSP00000292327.4		P08590

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00121

AC:

184

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00425

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000371

AC:

AN:

250476

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000266

AC XY:

AN XY:

135498

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00511

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000177

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000192

AC:

280

AN:

1461750

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000154

AC XY:

112

AN XY:

727190

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00702

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000402

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000116

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00000450

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000331

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00122

AC:

186

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00133

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00428

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000523

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000756

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00155

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:4

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 06, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Pro27Pro in Exon 01 of MYL3: This variant is not expected to have clinical signi ficance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within t he splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.3% (13/3738) of Africa n American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Pro ject (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs147584015). -

Nov 19, 2018

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: MYL3 c.81T>C alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00045 in 276222 control chromosomes, predominantly within the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.0048 in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 190 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in MYL3 causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (2.5e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. To our knowledge, no occurrence of c.81T>C in individuals affected with Cardiomyopathy and no experimental evidence demonstrating its impact on protein function have been reported. Co-occurrences with other pathogenic variant(s) have been reported (TTR c.424G>A, p.Val142Ile), providing supporting evidence for a benign role. Three clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation, and all these laboratories classified the variant as benign (1x) / likely benign (2x). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -

Aug 12, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Apr 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

MYL3: BP4, BP7 -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Oct 12, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 16, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 8

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Aug 12, 2015

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.81

CADD

Benign

0.090

DANN

Benign

0.46

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over