rs147871745
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_002471.4(MYH6):c.3627C>T(p.Ile1209=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00167 in 1,609,528 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0084 ( 24 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00096 ( 20 hom. )
Consequence
MYH6
NM_002471.4 synonymous
NM_002471.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.918
Genes affected
MYH6 (HGNC:7576): (myosin heavy chain 6) Cardiac muscle myosin is a hexamer consisting of two heavy chain subunits, two light chain subunits, and two regulatory subunits. This gene encodes the alpha heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. The gene is located approximately 4kb downstream of the gene encoding the beta heavy chain subunit of cardiac myosin. Mutations in this gene cause familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and atrial septal defect 3. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2017]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.65).
BP6
Variant 14-23390162-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-23390162-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 44489.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr14-23390162-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr14-23390162-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.918 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00841 (1276/151710) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0294 (1216/41298). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0281. There are 24 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 592 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1276 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | NM_002471.4 | c.3627C>T | p.Ile1209= | synonymous_variant | 26/39 | ENST00000405093.9 | NP_002462.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MYH6 | ENST00000405093.9 | c.3627C>T | p.Ile1209= | synonymous_variant | 26/39 | 5 | NM_002471.4 | ENSP00000386041 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00840 AC: 1273AN: 151594Hom.: 24 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1273
AN:
151594
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00244 AC: 610AN: 250246Hom.: 9 AF XY: 0.00166 AC XY: 224AN XY: 135340
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
610
AN:
250246
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
224
AN XY:
135340
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000964 AC: 1405AN: 1457818Hom.: 20 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.000781 AC XY: 566AN XY: 725076
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1405
AN:
1457818
Hom.:
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
AC XY:
566
AN XY:
725076
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00841 AC: 1276AN: 151710Hom.: 24 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00798 AC XY: 592AN XY: 74142
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1276
AN:
151710
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
592
AN XY:
74142
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Apr 03, 2012 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Mar 13, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 21, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 14 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Jun 09, 2016 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 08, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at