rs147891446

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001040142.2(SCN2A):c.2034A>G(p.Thr678Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00746 in 1,613,978 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 84 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0052 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0077 ( 80 hom. )

Consequence

SCN2A
NM_001040142.2 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0120

Variant links:

Genes affected

SCN2A (HGNC:10588): (sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 2) Voltage-gated sodium channels are transmembrane glycoprotein complexes composed of a large alpha subunit with four repeat domains, each of which is composed of six membrane-spanning segments, and one or more regulatory beta subunits. Voltage-gated sodium channels function in the generation and propagation of action potentials in neurons and muscle. This gene encodes one member of the sodium channel alpha subunit gene family. Allelic variants of this gene are associated with seizure disorders and autism spectrum disorder. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2016]

SCN2A links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.51).

BP6

Variant 2-165326869-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-165326869-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 139032.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr2-165326869-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.012 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00523 (796/152336) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.0166 (80/4830). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0136. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 369 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 796 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN2A	NM_001040142.2 link	c.2034A>G	p.Thr678Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 27	ENST00000375437.7	NP_001035232.1	Q99250-1
SCN2A	NM_001371246.1 link	c.2034A>G	p.Thr678Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 27	ENST00000631182.3	NP_001358175.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SCN2A	ENST00000375437.7 link	c.2034A>G	p.Thr678Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 27	5	NM_001040142.2	ENSP00000364586.2	Q99250-1
SCN2A	ENST00000631182.3 link	c.2034A>G	p.Thr678Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 27	5	NM_001371246.1	ENSP00000486885.1	Q99250-2
SCN2A	ENST00000283256.10 link	c.2034A>G	p.Thr678Thr	synonymous_variant	Exon 13 of 27	1		ENSP00000283256.6	Q99250-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00523

AC:

796

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.0362

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00445

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00403

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000192

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.0165

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0158

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00729

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00527

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00655

AC:

1647

AN:

251352

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00735

AC XY:

998

AN XY:

135826

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00117

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00240

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00387

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0187

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00296

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00739

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00490

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00769

AC:

11237

AN:

1461642

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00807

AC XY:

5865

AN XY:

727108

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00114

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00421

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0185

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00367

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00786

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00624

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00523

AC:

796

AN:

152336

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00495

AC XY:

369

AN XY:

74488

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00154

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00444

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00403

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.0166

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00226

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00729

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00522

Alfa

AF:

0.00607

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00484

Asia WGS

AF:

0.0120

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:5

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Oct 14, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:4

Jun 25, 2015

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sep 17, 2024

Athena Diagnostics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 14, 2012

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 30, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 07, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Seizures, benign familial infantile, 3;C3150987:Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 11

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Seizures, benign familial infantile, 3

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

7.8

DANN

Benign

0.81

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over