rs147903846
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBP6
The NM_001267550.2(TTN):āc.9851A>Gā(p.Lys3284Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000905 in 1,614,102 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. K3284N) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001267550.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | NM_001267550.2 | c.9851A>G | p.Lys3284Arg | missense_variant | Exon 42 of 363 | ENST00000589042.5 | NP_001254479.2 | |
| TTN | NM_133379.5 | c.9851A>G | p.Lys3284Arg | missense_variant | Exon 42 of 46 | ENST00000360870.10 | NP_596870.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTN | ENST00000589042.5 | c.9851A>G | p.Lys3284Arg | missense_variant | Exon 42 of 363 | 5 | NM_001267550.2 | ENSP00000467141.1 | ||
| TTN | ENST00000360870.10 | c.9851A>G | p.Lys3284Arg | missense_variant | Exon 42 of 46 | 5 | NM_133379.5 | ENSP00000354117.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000526 AC: 8AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000478 AC: 12AN: 251034 AF XY: 0.0000442 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000951 AC: 139AN: 1461832Hom.: 0 Cov.: 84 AF XY: 0.000105 AC XY: 76AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000460 AC: 7AN: 152270Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74440 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
Variant summary: TTN c.9851A>G (p.Lys3284Arg) results in a conservative amino acid change located in the I-Band of the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 4.8e-05 in 251034 control chromosomes (gnomAD). c.9851A>G has been reported in the literature in at least one individual affected with Dilated Cardiomyopathy without strong evidence of causality (Mazzarotto_2020). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Dilated Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 31983221). Five submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014, and classified it as uncertain significance (n=3) or likely benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31983221) -
Autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2J;C1858763:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1G Uncertain:1
- -
Cardiomyopathy Uncertain:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at