Menu
GeneBe

rs147972150

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points: 3P and 2B. PM2PP3BP4_Moderate

The NM_000400.4(ERCC2):c.47A>G(p.Tyr16Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000226 in 1,613,436 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. Y16Y) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC2
NM_000400.4 missense

Scores

9
3
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications P:1U:3B:3O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.24
Variant links:
Genes affected
ERCC2 (HGNC:3434): (ERCC excision repair 2, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit) The nucleotide excision repair pathway is a mechanism to repair damage to DNA. The protein encoded by this gene is involved in transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair and is an integral member of the basal transcription factor BTF2/TFIIH complex. The gene product has ATP-dependent DNA helicase activity and belongs to the RAD3/XPD subfamily of helicases. Defects in this gene can result in three different disorders, the cancer-prone syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D, trichothiodystrophy, and Cockayne syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 8: BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, M_CAP, MutationAssessor, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when AlphaMissense, BayesDel_addAF, max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.10332474).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
ERCC2NM_000400.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.47A>G p.Tyr16Cys missense_variant 2/23 ENST00000391945.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
ERCC2ENST00000391945.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.47A>G p.Tyr16Cys missense_variant 2/231 NM_000400.4 P1P18074-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00112
AC:
171
AN:
152122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00401
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000386
AC:
97
AN:
251072
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000272
AC XY:
37
AN XY:
135844
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00376
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000882
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000132
AC:
193
AN:
1461196
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000127
AC XY:
92
AN XY:
726892
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00326
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000358
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000614
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000450
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000116
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00112
AC:
171
AN:
152240
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
85
AN XY:
74426
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00400
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000830
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000199
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00114
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00431
AC:
19
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000404
AC:
49

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:3Benign:3Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Ovarian cancer Pathogenic:1
Likely pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Birth Defects, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan UniversityJan 01, 2022- -
Xeroderma pigmentosum Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Dec 01, 2021- -
Cerebrooculofacioskeletal syndrome 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsJun 05, 2019This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
Trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingBaylor GeneticsMar 10, 2020This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
ERCC2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 07, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Xeroderma pigmentosum, group D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 17, 2024- -
not specified Other:1
not provided, no classification providedreference populationITMISep 19, 2013- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.053
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.15
Cadd
Pathogenic
31
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.53
D;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.79
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.75
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.71
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
D;D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.56
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.10
T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.63
D
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.3
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.85
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.1
D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.77
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.13
T;T
Polyphen
0.98
D;D
Vest4
0.81
MVP
0.96
MPC
0.86
ClinPred
0.085
T
GERP RS
5.6
Varity_R
0.70
gMVP
0.78

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs147972150; hg19: chr19-45873449; API