Menu
GeneBe

rs148246073

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004168.4(SDHA):c.550G>A(p.Gly184Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000691 in 1,614,116 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. G184A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00068 ( 14 hom. )

Consequence

SDHA
NM_004168.4 missense

Scores

11
4
3

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.48
Variant links:
Genes affected
SDHA (HGNC:10680): (succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A) This gene encodes a major catalytic subunit of succinate-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, a complex of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. The complex is composed of four nuclear-encoded subunits and is localized in the mitochondrial inner membrane. Mutations in this gene have been associated with a form of mitochondrial respiratory chain deficiency known as Leigh Syndrome. A pseudogene has been identified on chromosome 3q29. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP3
Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 10: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Dann, Eigen, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PrimateAI, PROVEAN, REVEL [when max_spliceai, FATHMM_MKL, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.013642073).
BP6
Variant 5-225976-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-225976-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 221062.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-225976-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000808 (123/152298) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.021 (109/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0178. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 65 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
SDHANM_004168.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.550G>A p.Gly184Arg missense_variant 5/15 ENST00000264932.11

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
SDHAENST00000264932.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.550G>A p.Gly184Arg missense_variant 5/151 NM_004168.4 P1P31040-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000815
AC:
124
AN:
152180
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0212
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00155
AC:
391
AN:
251488
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00146
AC XY:
199
AN XY:
135920
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0202
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000392
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000326
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000679
AC:
993
AN:
1461818
Hom.:
14
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000646
AC XY:
470
AN XY:
727202
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0222
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000325
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000414
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000629
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152298
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000873
AC XY:
65
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0210
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000735
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000131
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000873
ExAC
AF:
0.00158
AC:
192
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000545
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxDec 11, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoAug 12, 2021- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoMar 13, 2019- -
Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
Paragangliomas 5;C5700310:Mitochondrial complex II deficiency, nuclear type 1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeFeb 01, 2024- -
Leigh syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsJun 05, 2017- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsApr 25, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Paragangliomas 5 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingKCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control CenterJul 07, 2023- -
Hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaApr 27, 2017This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.88
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.060
T
BayesDel_noAF
Pathogenic
0.33
Cadd
Pathogenic
30
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.40
T;.;.
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.91
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.88
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.87
D;D;D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.014
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.0050
T
MutationAssessor
Pathogenic
3.4
M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.85
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-7.3
D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.76
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0050
D;D;D
Polyphen
0.98
D;D;.
Vest4
0.90
MutPred
0.56
Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0116);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0116);.;
MVP
0.94
MPC
1.5
ClinPred
0.21
T
GERP RS
5.3
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.92
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.6
Varity_R
0.84
gMVP
0.96

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs148246073; hg19: chr5-226091; COSMIC: COSV53766590; COSMIC: COSV53766590; API