rs148681672

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_006565.4(CTCF):c.1986C>G(p.Pro662Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00127 in 1,591,818 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00067 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

CTCF
NM_006565.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.88

Variant links:

Genes affected

CTCF (HGNC:13723): (CCCTC-binding factor) This gene is a member of the BORIS + CTCF gene family and encodes a transcriptional regulator protein with 11 highly conserved zinc finger (ZF) domains. This nuclear protein is able to use different combinations of the ZF domains to bind different DNA target sequences and proteins. Depending upon the context of the site, the protein can bind a histone acetyltransferase (HAT)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional activator or bind a histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing complex and function as a transcriptional repressor. If the protein is bound to a transcriptional insulator element, it can block communication between enhancers and upstream promoters, thereby regulating imprinted expression. Mutations in this gene have been associated with invasive breast cancers, prostate cancers, and Wilms' tumors. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2010]

CTCF links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.63).

BP6

Variant 16-67636838-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-67636838-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 210801.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.88 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00067 (102/152160) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00126 (86/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00105. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 36 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 102 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CTCF	NM_006565.4 link	c.1986C>G	p.Pro662Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	ENST00000264010.10	NP_006556.1	P49711-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CTCF	ENST00000264010.10 link	c.1986C>G	p.Pro662Pro	synonymous_variant	Exon 11 of 12	1	NM_006565.4	ENSP00000264010.4		P49711-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000671

AC:

102

AN:

152042

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000121

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000328

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000378

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00126

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00104

AC:

245

AN:

236456

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000945

AC XY:

121

AN XY:

128104

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000259

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000821

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000699

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00180

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000710

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00133

AC:

1918

AN:

1439658

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00127

AC XY:

910

AN XY:

715274

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000122

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000955

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000829

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00128

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000670

AC:

102

AN:

152160

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000484

AC XY:

AN XY:

74380

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000120

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000328

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000378

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00126

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000934

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000793

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CTCF: BP4 -

Sep 17, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Uncertain:1

Sep 12, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jul 08, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

CTCF-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 22, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.63

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.67

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over