rs149754073
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6
The NM_000057.4(BLM):c.2362C>A(p.Leu788Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000516 in 1,613,836 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L788F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000057.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -5 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | NM_000057.4 | c.2362C>A | p.Leu788Ile | missense_variant | 11/22 | ENST00000355112.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLM | ENST00000355112.8 | c.2362C>A | p.Leu788Ile | missense_variant | 11/22 | 1 | NM_000057.4 | P2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000421 AC: 64AN: 152196Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000911 AC: 229AN: 251482Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000868 AC XY: 118AN XY: 135916
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000525 AC: 768AN: 1461640Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000502 AC XY: 365AN XY: 727122
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000421 AC: 64AN: 152196Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000430 AC XY: 32AN XY: 74346
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Bloom syndrome Uncertain:2Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | May 22, 2017 | This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | May 26, 2017 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | May 31, 2023 | The BLM c.2362C>A (p.Leu788Ile) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.081% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org). The in silico tool REVEL is inconclusive about a pathogenic or benign effect of this variant on protein function, and to our knowledge functional studies have not been performed. This variant has been reported in one individual with breast cancer (PMID: 23028338), and in cases with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PMID: 33332384), colorectal cancer (PMID: 28944238) and one suspected Lynch syndrome (PMID: 32660107). It has also identified in 2 of 1358 control individuals collected as part of non-cancer studies (PMID: 29641532). To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in individuals with Bloom syndrome. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jan 09, 2020 | - - |
BLM-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 21, 2022 | The BLM c.2362C>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Leu788Ile. This variant was reported as variant of uncertain significance in an individual with suspected Lynch syndrome, who also carried a missense variant in WRN (Table S1, Olkinuora et al 2020. PubMed ID: 32660107). This variant is also reported in one individual with breast cancer (Table S4, Thompson et al. 2012. PubMed ID: 23028338). The p.Leu788Ile substitution is predicted with neutral effects for stability (Table 2, Sora and Otamendi et al. 2022 (preprint), https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.09.02.506350v1.full.pdf). This variant is reported in 0.57% of alleles in individuals of European (Finnish) descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/15-91312417-C-A). In ClinVar, this variant is interpreted as benign/likely benign/uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/127485/?new_evidence=false). This variant could be benign, however, due to the small cohort sizes we interpret these data as inconclusive. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 07, 2020 | Observed in individuals with a personal history of breast cancer (Thompson et al., 2012); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23028338) - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 05, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at