rs150343359
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7
The NM_000152.5(GAA):c.915G>A(p.Gly305Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00125 in 1,612,034 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0011 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
GAA
NM_000152.5 synonymous
NM_000152.5 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.28
Genes affected
GAA (HGNC:4065): (alpha glucosidase) This gene encodes lysosomal alpha-glucosidase, which is essential for the degradation of glycogen to glucose in lysosomes. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate multiple intermediate forms and the mature form of the enzyme. Defects in this gene are the cause of glycogen storage disease II, also known as Pompe's disease, which is an autosomal recessive disorder with a broad clinical spectrum. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2016]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.75).
BP6
Variant 17-80107856-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-80107856-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 188478.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=7, Uncertain_significance=3}. Variant chr17-80107856-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.28 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | NM_000152.5 | c.915G>A | p.Gly305Gly | synonymous_variant | 5/20 | ENST00000302262.8 | NP_000143.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAA | ENST00000302262.8 | c.915G>A | p.Gly305Gly | synonymous_variant | 5/20 | 1 | NM_000152.5 | ENSP00000305692.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00108 AC: 164AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
164
AN:
152210
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00112 AC: 275AN: 245568Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00117 AC XY: 157AN XY: 133774
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
275
AN:
245568
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
133774
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00127 AC: 1856AN: 1459706Hom.: 0 Cov.: 56 AF XY: 0.00132 AC XY: 959AN XY: 726150
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
1856
AN:
1459706
Hom.:
Cov.:
56
AF XY:
AC XY:
959
AN XY:
726150
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00108 AC: 164AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000926 AC XY: 69AN XY: 74484
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
164
AN:
152328
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
74484
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type II Uncertain:1Benign:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Broad Center for Mendelian Genomics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard | Jan 22, 2020 | The c.915G>A (p.Gly305=) variant in GAA has been reported in 2 individuals with limb-girdle muscle weakness (PMID: 29149851) and has also been reported as a likely benign variant by GeneDx and Invitae and as a VUS by EGL in ClinVar (Variation ID: 188478). This variant has been identified in 0.1843% (232/125858) of European (non-Finnish) chromosomes and 0.1138% (40/35140) of Latino chromosomes by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs150343359). Although this variant has been seen in the general population, its frequency is not high enough to rule out a pathogenic role. Computational prediction tools (including splice predictors) and conservation analyses suggest that this variant may not impact the protein, though this information is not predictive enough to rule out pathogenicity. Novel synonymous variants supported by computational evidence without raised suspicion for an impact are likely benign (Richards 2015). In summary, although additional studies are required to fully establish its clinical significance, this variant is likely benign. ACMG/AMP Criteria applied: BP4, BP7 (Richards 2015). - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Jan 10, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 21, 2022 | - - |
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Mar 23, 2023 | BP4, BP7, PM3 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 19, 2021 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 22644586, 29149851) - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Aug 10, 2018 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Oct 01, 2024 | GAA: BP4, BP7 - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 04, 2022 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at